Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320144›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2018

A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Rotator Cuff.

Jeffrey Jancuska, John Matthews, Tyler Miller, Melissa A Kluczynski, Leslie J Bisson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey JancuskaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
John MatthewsDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Tyler MillerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Melissa A KluczynskiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Leslie J BissonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the rotator cuff (RC) has increased markedly. PURPOSE: To quantify the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the RC and to provide a qualitative summary of the literature. STUDY

designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsA systematic search for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to the RC published between January 2007 and September 2017 was performed with PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Narrative reviews and non-English language articles were excluded.

resultsA total of 1078 articles were found, of which 196 met the inclusion criteria. Included articles were summarized and divided into 15 topics: anatomy and function, histology and genetics, diagnosis, epidemiology, athletes, nonoperative versus operative treatment, surgical repair methods, concomitant conditions and surgical procedures, RC tears after total shoulder arthroplasty, biological augmentation, postoperative rehabilitation, outcomes and complications, patient-reported outcome measures, cost-effectiveness of RC repair, and quality of randomized controlled trials.

conclusionA qualitative summary of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the RC can provide surgeons with a single source of the most current literature.

Indexed as

meta-analysisrepairrotator cuffsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30320144
PMCPMC6154263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.