Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30320064›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2018

Thermally Driven Selective Nanocomposite PS-PHB/MGC Nanofibrous Conductive Sensor for Air Pollutant Detection.

Joshua Avossa, Emiliano Zampetti, Fabrizio De Cesare, Andrea Bearzotti, Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza, Giuseppe Vitiello, Eyal Zussman, Antonella Macagnano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua AvossaInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research-National Research Council (IIA-CNR), Monterotondo, Italy.
Emiliano ZampettiInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research-National Research Council (IIA-CNR), Monterotondo, Italy.
Fabrizio De CesareInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research-National Research Council (IIA-CNR), Monterotondo, Italy.
Andrea BearzottiInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research-National Research Council (IIA-CNR), Monterotondo, Italy.
Giuseppe Scarascia-MugnozzaDepartment of Innovation in Biological Systems, Food and Forestry, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Giuseppe VitielloDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Eyal ZussmanFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Antonella MacagnanoInstitute of Atmospheric Pollution Research-National Research Council (IIA-CNR), Monterotondo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potentials to use the working temperature to tune both the sensitivity and the selectivity of a chemical sensor based on a nanostructured and nanocomposite polymer layer have been investigated and described. Thus, in a single step, a peculiar chemical layer was grown up onto IDE (Interdigitated Electrode) microtransducers by electrospinning deposition and using a single-needle strategy. The 3-component nanofibers, obtained from a mixture of polystyrene and polyhydroxibutyrate (insulating thermoplastics) and a known concentration of mesoporous graphitized carbon nanopowder, appeared highly rough on the surface and decorated with jagged islands but homogeneous in shape and diameter, with the nanofillers aggregated into clusters more or less densely packed through the fibers. The resulting sensor was conductive at room temperature and could work between 40 and 80°C without any apparent degradation. As the fibrous sensing layer was heated, the current increased and the sensitivity to some classes of VOCs such as an oxidizing gas drastically changed depending on the working temperature. More in detail, the sensor resulted highly sensitive and selective to acetic acid at 40°C but the sensitivity fell down, decreasing by 96%, when the sensor operated at 80°C. On the other hand, although an increase in temperature caused a general decrease in sensitivity to the tested VOCs (with a maximum of 14, 81, and 78% for amine, acetone and toluene, respectively) and water vapors (with a maximum of 55%), higher temperature affected only slightly the amine permeation, thus modifying the partial selectivity of the sensor to these chemicals. Conversely, when the operating temperature increased, the sensitivity to the detected gas, NO

Indexed as

electrospinning technologygas/VOCs conductive sensorhybrid and nanocomposite polymer nanofibersmesoporous graphenesensor working temperature effects

Identifiers

PMID30320064
PMCPMC6167489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.