Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30319678›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2018

Emerging Pleiotropic Mechanisms Underlying Aluminum Resistance and Phosphorus Acquisition on Acidic Soils.

Jurandir V Magalhaes, Miguel A Piñeros, Laiane S Maciel, Leon V Kochian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stimulatory Effect of Aluminum in Root Development ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How Plants Handle Trivalent (+3) Elements.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jurandir V MagalhaesEmbrapa Maize and Sorghum, Sete Lagoas, Brazil.
Miguel A PiñerosRobert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, USDA-ARS, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Laiane S MacielEmbrapa Maize and Sorghum, Sete Lagoas, Brazil.
Leon V KochianGlobal Institute for Food Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRCornell University · USGlobal Institute for Water Security · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aluminum (Al) toxicity on acidic soils significantly damages plant roots and inhibits root growth. Hence, crops intoxicated by Al become more sensitive to drought stress and mineral nutrient deficiencies, particularly phosphorus (P) deficiency, which is highly unavailable on tropical soils. Advances in our understanding of the physiological and genetic mechanisms that govern plant Al resistance have led to the identification of Al resistance genes, both in model systems and in crop species. It has long been known that Al resistance has a beneficial effect on crop adaptation to acidic soils. This positive effect happens because the root systems of Al resistant plants show better development in the presence of soil ionic Al

Indexed as

abiotic stress resistancealuminum tolerancephosphorus acquisitionphosphorus efficiencyplant breedingpleiotropytransporters

Identifiers

PMID30319678
PMCPMC6168647
OpenAlexW2892769387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.