Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30319648›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2018

Checkpoint Inhibition in Myeloma: Opportunities and Challenges.

Federica Costa, Rituparna Das, Jithendra Kini Bailur, Kavita Dhodapkar, Madhav V Dhodapkar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. FAPαAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Is an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment a Characteristic of Both Intra- and Extraparenchymal Central Nervous Tumors?Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica CostaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Rituparna DasWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jithendra Kini BailurWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kavita DhodapkarWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Madhav V DhodapkarWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Emory University · USUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

HARNESSING HOST RESPONSE TO PREVENT MYELOMAR35CA197603 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DHODAPKAR, MADHAV V · 2016 to 2022
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major improvements in the treatment landscape, most multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually succumb to the underlying malignancy. Immunotherapy represents an attractive strategy to achieve durable remissions due to its specificity and capacity for long term memory. Activation of immune cells is controlled by a balance of agonistic and inhibitory signals via surface and intracellular receptors. Blockade of such inhibitory immune receptors (termed as "immune checkpoints") including PD-1/PD-L1 has led to impressive tumor regressions in several cancers. Preclinical studies suggest that these immune checkpoints may also play a role in regulating tumor immunity in MM. Indeed, myeloma was among the first tumors wherein therapeutic efficacy of blockade of PD-1 axis was demonstrated in preclinical models. Expression of PD-L1 on tumor and immune cells also correlates with the risk of malignant transformation. However, early clinical studies of single agent PD-1 blockade have not led to meaningful tumor regressions. Immune modulatory drugs (IMiDs) are now the mainstay of most MM therapies. Interestingly, the mechanism of immune activation by IMiDs also involves release of inhibitory checkpoints, such as Ikaros-mediated suppression of IL-2. Combination of PD-1 targeted agents with IMiDs led to promising clinical activity, including objective responses in some patients refractory to IMiD therapy. However, some of these studies were transiently halted in 2017 due to concern for a possible safety signal with IMiD-PD1 combination. The capacity of the immune system to control MM has been further reinforced by recent success of adoptive cell therapies, such as T cells redirected by chimeric-antigen receptors (CAR-Ts). There remains an unmet need to better understand the immunologic effects of checkpoint blockade, delineate mechanisms of resistance to these therapies and identify optimal combination of agonistic signaling, checkpoint inhibitors as well as other therapies including CAR-Ts, to realize the potential of the immune system to control and prevent MM.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenDisease Models, AnimalHumansMultiple MyelomaProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTreatment OutcomeTumor EscapeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptors, Chimeric Antigenimmune checkpointimmunotherapymyelomaPD-1PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID30319648
PMCPMC6168958
OpenAlexW2894398271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.