Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30319557›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2018

Addressing Global Ruminant Agricultural Challenges Through Understanding the Rumen Microbiome: Past, Present, and Future.

Sharon A Huws, Christopher J Creevey, Linda B Oyama, Itzhak Mizrahi, Stuart E Denman, Milka Popova, Rafael Muñoz-Tamayo, Evelyne Forano, Sinead M Waters, Matthias Hess and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 229 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed
55.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed, 513 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effects of Replacing Whole-Crop Maize Silage withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.

Sharon A HuwsInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Christopher J CreeveyInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Linda B OyamaInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Itzhak MizrahiDepartment of Life Sciences and the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Stuart E DenmanCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Agriculture and Food, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Milka PopovaInstitute National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1213 Herbivores, Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Rafael Muñoz-TamayoUMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Evelyne ForanoUMR 454 MEDIS, INRA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Sinead M WatersAnimal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Grange, Ireland.
Matthias HessCollege of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Ilma TapioNatural Resources Institute Finland, Jokioinen, Finland.
Hauke SmidtDepartment of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Sophie J KrizsanDepartment of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
David R Yáñez-RuizEstacion Experimental del Zaidin, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Granada, Spain.
Alejandro BelancheEstacion Experimental del Zaidin, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Granada, Spain.
Leluo GuanDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Robert J GruningerLethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Tim A McAllisterLethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
C Jamie NewboldScotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rainer RoeheScotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Richard J DewhurstScotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tim J SnellingThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Mick WatsonThe Roslin Institute and the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Garret SuenDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Elizabeth H HartInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
Alison H Kingston-SmithInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
Nigel D ScollanInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Rodolpho M do PradoLaboratório de Biomoléculas e Espectrometria de Massas-Labiomass, Departamento de Química, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Eduardo J PilauLaboratório de Biomoléculas e Espectrometria de Massas-Labiomass, Departamento de Química, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.
Hilario C MantovaniDepartment of Microbiology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Graeme T AttwoodAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Joan E EdwardsLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Neil R McEwanSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Steven MorrissonSustainable Livestock, Agri-Food and Bio-Sciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom.
Olga L MayorgaColombian Agricultural Research Corporation, Mosquera, Colombia.
Christopher ElliottInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Diego P MorgaviInstitute National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1213 Herbivores, Clermont Université, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Queen's University Belfast · GBScotland's Rural College · GBAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BRVetAgro Sup · FRWageningen University & Research · NLAberystwyth University · GBAgResearch · NZAgriculture and Food · AUAgri Food and Biosciences Institute · GBAgroParisTech · FRBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILColombian Corporation for Agricultural Research - AGROSAVIA · COConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESEstación Experimental del Zaidín · ESInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences · GBNatural Resources Institute Finland · FIRobert Gordon University · GBSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rumen is a complex ecosystem composed of anaerobic bacteria, protozoa, fungi, methanogenic archaea and phages. These microbes interact closely to breakdown plant material that cannot be digested by humans, whilst providing metabolic energy to the host and, in the case of archaea, producing methane. Consequently, ruminants produce meat and milk, which are rich in high-quality protein, vitamins and minerals, and therefore contribute to food security. As the world population is predicted to reach approximately 9.7 billion by 2050, an increase in ruminant production to satisfy global protein demand is necessary, despite limited land availability, and whilst ensuring environmental impact is minimized. Although challenging, these goals can be met, but depend on our understanding of the rumen microbiome. Attempts to manipulate the rumen microbiome to benefit global agricultural challenges have been ongoing for decades with limited success, mostly due to the lack of a detailed understanding of this microbiome and our limited ability to culture most of these microbes outside the rumen. The potential to manipulate the rumen microbiome and meet global livestock challenges through animal breeding and introduction of dietary interventions during early life have recently emerged as promising new technologies. Our inability to phenotype ruminants in a high-throughput manner has also hampered progress, although the recent increase in "omic" data may allow further development of mathematical models and rumen microbial gene biomarkers as proxies. Advances in computational tools, high-throughput sequencing technologies and cultivation-independent "omics" approaches continue to revolutionize our understanding of the rumen microbiome. This will ultimately provide the knowledge framework needed to solve current and future ruminant livestock challenges.

Indexed as

diethostmethanemicrobiomeomicsproductionrumen

Identifiers

PMID30319557
PMCPMC6167468
OpenAlexW2889449548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.