Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30319385›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2018

Pipeline for Analyzing Lesions After Stroke (PALS).

Kaori L Ito, Amit Kumar, Artemis Zavaliangos-Petropulu, Steven C Cramer, Sook-Lei Liew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. The elusive metric of lesion load.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaori L ItoNeural Plasticity and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Amit KumarNeural Plasticity and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Artemis Zavaliangos-PetropuluNeural Plasticity and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Steven C CramerDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Sook-Lei LiewNeural Plasticity and Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

Technique Development CoreP2CHD065702 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GRAHAM, JAMES E. · 2015 to 2019
$5.2M
Big Data Neuroimaging to Predict Motor Behavior After StrokeK01HD091283 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LIEW, SOOK-LEI · 2017 to 2020
$802k
Brain plasticity and rehabilitation after strokeK24HD074722 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C. · 2013 to 2017
$588k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD091283NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD074722NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesion analyses are critical for drawing insights about stroke injury and recovery, and their importance is underscored by growing efforts to collect and combine stroke neuroimaging data across research sites. However, while there are numerous processing pipelines for neuroimaging data in general, few can be smoothly applied to stroke data due to complications analyzing the lesioned region. As researchers often use their own tools or manual methods for stroke MRI analysis, this could lead to greater errors and difficulty replicating findings over time and across sites. Rigorous analysis protocols and quality control pipelines are thus urgently needed for stroke neuroimaging. To this end, we created the Pipeline for Analyzing Lesions after Stroke (PALS; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1266980), a scalable and user-friendly toolbox to facilitate and ensure quality in stroke research specifically using T1-weighted MRIs. The PALS toolbox offers four modules integrated into a single pipeline, including (1) reorientation to radiological convention, (2) lesion correction for healthy white matter voxels, (3) lesion load calculation, and (4) visual quality control. In the present paper, we discuss each module and provide validation and example cases of our toolbox using multi-site data. Importantly, we also show that lesion correction with PALS significantly improves similarity between manual lesion segmentations by different tracers (

Indexed as

big datalesion analysislesion loadMRI imagingneuroimagingstrokestroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID30319385
PMCPMC6165891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.