ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Late Administration of Trastuzumab Emtansine Might Lead to Loss of Chance for Better Outcome in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attrition between lines of therapy and real-world outcomes of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in Europe: a cohort study leveraging electronic medical records.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Observational
- COVID-19 outbreak: An experience to reappraise the role of hospital at home in the anti-cancer drug injection.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Second line trastuzumab emtansine following horizontal dual blockade in a real-life setting.Oncotarget · 2020Article
- Comparing MicroRNA Profilings of Purified HER-2-Negative and HER-2-Positive Cells Validates miR-362-5p/Sema3A as Characteristic Molecular Change in Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.Disease markers · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal sequence of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still undetermined. Physicians must therefore make decisions based on clinical trials and their own experience for the best treatment sequence in these patients. The objective of this review is to summarize the efficacy and safety data for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with MBC. Additionally, the concept of 'loss of chance for a better outcome' is investigated. It applies to patients who are not receiving the best possible treatment for their disease. Physicians should strive to offer the best possible care, although getting optimal results in each individual patient is not guaranteed. Lastly, the number of patients with MBC lost per treatment line is evaluated. We conclude that both concepts reinforce the importance of giving the most active treatments as soon as possible in the course of disease to secure the longest possible survival for HER2-positive MBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.