Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30319327›Full record

ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Neoadjuvant Model as a Platform for Research in Breast Cancer and Novel Targets under Development in this Field.

Santiago Escrivá-de-Romaní, Miriam Arumí, Esther Zamora, Meritxell Bellet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive factors for pCR and relapse following neoadjuvant dual HER2-blockade in HER2+ breast cancer: an international cohort study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer as a Model for Translational Research.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago Escrivá-de-RomaníMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Miriam ArumíMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Esther ZamoraMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Meritxell BelletMedical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, the neoadjuvant setting has provided a useful scenario for research in breast cancer. Historically, neoadjuvant clinical trials, either hormone therapy-based or chemotherapy-based, have tried to recapitulate the results of their counterpart adjuvant studies, but with smaller patient numbers, more rapid outcomes (clinical response and/or pathologic complete response (pCR)), together with additional biologic information. As for neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials, the increase in pCR rates has been recently accepted as an appropriate surrogate marker to accelerate drug approval in high-risk breast cancer patients. In this setting, with the exception of luminal A tumors, pCR has been associated with improved long-term outcomes, particularly when the analysis is based on specific trials for each breast cancer subtype. For luminal tumors receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, Ki67 at 2-4 weeks and the preoperative endocrine prognostic index score are the most accepted intermediate markers of efficacy, which will be validated in ongoing larger trials. In this review, we describe the different neoadjuvant designs: from the classical randomized trials in which treatment is delivered for 6 or more months to short non-therapeutic presurgical studies lasting just 2 or 3 weeks. We also review the main neoadjuvant trials, either ongoing or completed, for luminal, triple-negative, and HER2-positive breast cancer. The translational effort and research of biomarkers conducted in these studies will be particularly addressed.

Indexed as

BiomarkerBreast cancerChemotherapyEndocrine therapyNeoadjuvantTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID30319327
PMCPMC6170905
OpenAlexW2887899665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.