Trial reportAIDS care2019
Trajectory of use over time of an oral tablet and a rectal gel for HIV prevention among transgender women and men who have sex with men.
Trial report in AIDS care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01687218 (A Phase 2 Randomized Sequence Open Label Expanded Safety and Acceptability Study of Oral Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablet and Rectally-Applied Tenofovir Reduced-Glycerin 1% Gel), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Randomized Sequence Open Label Expanded Safety and Acceptability Study of Oral Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablet and Rectally-Applied Tenofovir Reduced-Glycerin 1% Gel
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A latent trajectory analysis of young sexual and gender minorities' adherence to three rectal microbicide placebo formulations (MTN-035; a randomized crossover trial).BMC public health · 2023Trial
- Assessing the Acceptability of a Tenofovir-Based Rectal Microbicide Douche among Young Men who Have Sex with Men: Results from ATN-DREAM (ATN 163).AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
- Addressing Health Inequities in Digital Clinical Trials: A Review of Challenges and Solutions From the Field of HIV Research.Epidemiologic reviews · 2022Review
- Acceptability of a Dapivirine/Placebo Gel Administered Rectally to HIV-1 Seronegative Adults (MTN-026).AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Preference for using a variety of future HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis products among men who have sex with men in three US cities.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We examined product adherence among 187 men who have sex with men and transgender women enrolled in a phase II, crossover trial comparing safety and acceptability of an oral tablet and a rectal gel used daily for HIV prevention. Participants reported adherence via daily text messages during 8-week periods. Trajectory analysis identified weekly patterns. Polytomous logistic regression identified characteristics associated with higher probability of trajectory group membership. We identified 3 groups per product: high-adherers (72% daily oral, 70% daily gel); decreasing-adherers (20% daily oral, 22% daily gel); and low-adherers (8% daily oral, 9% daily gel). Daily oral high-adherers (compared with low-adherers) were more likely to self-identify as male (OR = 4.76, 95% CI:1.35-16.67), to have more sexual partners (OR = 1.67, 95% CI:1.04-2.63), and to find the tablet easy to swallow (OR = 2.22, 95% CI:1.08-4.76). Daily gel high-adherers (compared with low-adherers) were more likely to be older (OR = 1.16, 95% CI:1.05-1.28), to find gel application easier at the last few applications (OR = 2.27, 95% CI:1.01-5.00), and to report a change in routine if gel was not used (OR = 5.26, 95% CI:1.23-100.00). Characteristics of participants likely to be high-adherers to product use vary according to product. Evaluation of acceptability prior to phase II/III trials could identify participants likely to maintain high adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.