Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30318729›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2018

Clinical whole-exome sequencing results impact medical management.

Nancy Niguidula, Christina Alamillo, Layla Shahmirzadi Mowlavi, Zöe Powis, Julie S Cohen, Kelly D Farwell Hagman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. How variants of uncertain significance affect clinical decisions: A systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Improving access to exome sequencing in a medically underserved population through the Texome Project.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  12. Utility of exome sequencing for the diagnosis of pediatric-onset neuromuscular diseases beyond diagnostic yield: a narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nancy NiguidulaAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-2297
Christina AlamilloAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6749-7304
Layla Shahmirzadi MowlaviAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.ORCID 0000-0002-7684-183X
Zöe PowisAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1347-4358
Julie S CohenDivision of Neurogenetics and Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-0293
Kelly D Farwell HagmanAmbry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, California.ORCID 0000-0003-1173-052X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical diagnostic whole-exome sequencing (WES) is a powerful tool for patients with undiagnosed genetic disorders. To demonstrate the clinical utility, we surveyed healthcare providers (HCP) about changes in medical management and treatment, diagnostic testing, reproductive planning, and use of educational services subsequent to WES testing.

methodsFor a period of 18 months, an 18-question survey was sent to HCPs attached to the WES reports. We analyzed the molecular diagnosis, patient clinical features, and the medical management changes reported in the returned surveys.

resultsA total of 62 (2.2% of 2,876) surveys were returned, consisting of 37.1% patients with a positive or likely positive pathogenic alteration, 51.6% negative results, 9.7% uncertain findings, and 1 patient (1.6%) with a novel candidate finding. Overall, 100% of the HCPs of patients with positive or likely positive WES results (n = 23) and HCPs of patients with uncertain WES results (n = 6) responded positively to one of the 18 queries. Of note, 37.5% of the HCPs of patients with negative WES results (n = 32) responded positively to at least one query.

conclusionOverall, these data clearly demonstrate the clinical utility of WES by demonstrating the impact on medical management irrespective of the exome result.

Indexed as

Facilities and Services UtilizationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDisease ManagementExome SequencingFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle Agedclinical utilitydiagnostic exome sequencingdiagnostic odysseymedical managementwhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30318729
PMCPMC6305629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.