Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30318674›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019

Hemodynamic measurements with an abdominal 4D flow MRI sequence with spiral sampling and compressed sensing in patients with chronic liver disease.

Octavia Bane, Steven Peti, Mathilde Wagner, Stefanie Hectors, Hadrien Dyvorne, Michael Markl, Bachir Taouli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Abdominal applications of quantitative 4D flow MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  13. Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MRI in the Portal Venous System.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Quality Control for 4D Flow MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Octavia BaneDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-5848
Steven PetiDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Mathilde WagnerTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Stefanie HectorsDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Hadrien DyvorneTranslational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Michael MarklDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Bachir TaouliDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USGuilford County Schools · USNorthwestern University · USSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

Prediction of portal pressure with liver and spleen MR Elastography and 4D flow phase-contrast MRIR01DK113272 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TAOULI, BACHIR · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
Detection of Liver Fibrosis Using IVIM Diffusion and DCE MRI in HCVR01DK087877 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TAOULI, BACHIR · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Quantification of Renal Perfusion, Diffusion and Hypoxia Using Advanced MRI Methods for Assessment of Renal Transplant DysfunctionF32DK109591 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BANE, OCTAVIA · 2016 to 2018
$126k
GERM CELL INFLUENCE ON SERTOLI CELL MRNA EXPRESSIONF32DK008787 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MC GUINNESS, MICHAEL P · 1993 to 1995
–
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK008787NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK109591NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK087877NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe test-retest/interobserver repeatability and diagnostic value of 4D flow MRI in liver disease is underreported. PURPOSE: To determine the reproducibility/repeatability of flow quantification in abdominal vessels using a spiral 4D flow MRI sequence; to assess the value of 4D flow parameters in diagnosing cirrhosis and degree of portal hypertension. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Fifty-two patients with chronic liver disease. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T/spiral 4D flow acquired in one breath-hold. ASSESSMENT: Thirteen abdominal vessels were identified and segmented by two independent observers to measure maximum and time-averaged through-plane velocity, net flow, and vessel cross-section area. Interobserver agreement and test-retest repeatability were evaluated in 15 and 4 cases, respectively. Prediction of the presence and severity of cirrhosis and portal hypertension was assessed using 4D flow parameters. STATISTICAL TESTS: Cohen's kappa coefficient, coefficient of variation (CV), Bland-Altman, Mann-Whitney tests, logistic regression.

resultsFor all vessels combined, measurements showed acceptable agreement between observers, with Cohen's kappa = 0.70 (P < 0.001), CV < 21%, Bland-Altman bias <5%, but high limits of agreement ([-75%,75%]). Test-retest repeatability was excellent in large vessels (CV = 1-15%, bias = 1-25%, Bland-Altman limits of agreement [BALA] = [4%,150%]), and poor in small vessels (CV = 7-130%, bias = 10-200%, BALA = [8%,190%]). Average velocity in the right hepatic vein and average area of the splenic vein were higher in cirrhosis (P = 0.027/0.0039). Flow in the middle hepatic vein strongly correlated with Child-Pugh score (ρ = 0.84, P = 0.0238), while flow in the splenic vein (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.032), time-average (ρ = 0.46, P = 0.02) and peak velocity in the superior mesenteric vein (ρ = 0.45, P = 0.032), and peak velocity in the infrarenal IVC (ρ = 0.39, P = 0.032) positively correlated with an imaging-based portal hypertension score. Average area of the splenic vein predicted cirrhosis (P = 0.019; area under the curve AUC [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.87 [0.71,1.00]) and clinically significant portal hypertension (P = 0.042; AUC [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.57-0.99]). DATA

conclusionSpiral 4D flow allows comprehensive assessment of abdominal vessels in one breath-hold, with substantial interobserver reproducibility, but variable test-retest repeatability. 4D flow may potentially reflect vascular changes due to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:994-1005.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAbdomenAdultAgedEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHumansHypertension, PortalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedObserver Variation4D flowcirrhosisliver fibrosisphase contrast MRIportal hypertensionspiral

Identifiers

PMID30318674
PMCPMC6417969
OpenAlexW2896786971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.