Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30318331›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2019

askMUSIC: Leveraging a Clinical Registry to Develop a New Machine Learning Model to Inform Patients of Prostate Cancer Treatments Chosen by Similar Men.

Gregory B Auffenberg, Khurshid R Ghani, Shreyas Ramani, Etiowo Usoro, Brian Denton, Craig Rogers, Benjamin Stockton, David C Miller, Karandeep Singh, Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating the Educational Value of Cancer Registries - a Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory B AuffenbergDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Khurshid R GhaniDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shreyas RamaniSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Etiowo UsoroSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brian DentonDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Industrial & Operations Engineering, University of Michigan College of Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Craig RogersDepartment of Urology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Benjamin StocktonLakeside Urology PC, St. Joseph, MI, USA.
David C MillerDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Karandeep SinghSchool of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: kdpsingh@umich.edu.
Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USHenry Ford Health System · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

University of Michigan UroEPI Career Development ProgramK12DK111011 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLEMENS, J. QUENTIN, SARMA, ARUNA V · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
Advanced Training in Urologic OncologyT32CA180984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ganesh S Palapattu, VAHAKN B SHAHINIAN · 2014 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA180984NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK111011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical registries provide physicians with a means for making data-driven decisions but few opportunities exist for patients to interact with registry data to help make decisions.

objectiveWe sought to develop a web-based system that uses a prostate cancer (CaP) registry to provide newly diagnosed men with a platform to view predicted treatment decisions based on patients with similar characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) is a quality improvement consortium of urology practices that maintains a prospective registry of men with CaP. We used registry data from 45 MUSIC urology practices from 2015 to 2017 to develop and validate a random forest machine learning model. After fitting the random forest model to a derivation cohort consisting of a random two-thirds sample of patients after stratifying by practice location, we evaluated the model performance in a validation cohort consisting of the remaining one-third of patients using a multiclass area under the curve (AUC) measure and calibration plots. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 7543 men diagnosed with CaP, of whom 45% underwent radical prostatectomy, 30% surveillance, 17% radiation therapy, 5.6% androgen deprivation, and 1.8% watchful waiting. The personalized prediction for patients in the validation cohort was highly accurate (AUC 0.81).

conclusionsUsing clinical registry data and machine learning methods, we created a web-based platform for patients that generates accurate predictions for most CaP treatments. PATIENT SUMMARY: We have developed and tested a tool to help men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer to view predicted treatment decisions based on similar patients from our registry. We have made this tool available online for patients to use.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, TheoreticalPatient Education as TopicRegistriesAgedDecision MakingHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsMachine learningPatient educationProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30318331
PMCPMC6459726
OpenAlexW2897336679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.