ArticleEuropean urology2019
askMUSIC: Leveraging a Clinical Registry to Develop a New Machine Learning Model to Inform Patients of Prostate Cancer Treatments Chosen by Similar Men.
Article in European urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Educational Value of Cancer Registries - a Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Pooled it
- Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- Explainable and visualizable machine learning model development and validation for 5-year postoperative survival prediction in prostate cancer patients aged ≥ 65 years.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for prostate cancer: Optimizing diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Review
- Patient preferences for life expectancy cutoffs for aggressive treatment in clinically localized prostate cancer.Urologic oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand today?Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Risk Prediction Model Development to Support Cancer Care Delivery: A Scoping Review.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Prostate cancer treatment recommendation study based on machine learning and SHAP interpreter.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- The Present and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Urological Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Explainable ML models for a deeper insight on treatment decision for localized prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Prostate Cancer.Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Review
- Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.World journal of urology · 2022Review
- Neighborhood-based inference and restricted Boltzmann machine for microbe and drug associations prediction.PeerJ · 2022Article
- A data-driven performance dashboard for surgical dissection.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer.Research and reports in urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical registries provide physicians with a means for making data-driven decisions but few opportunities exist for patients to interact with registry data to help make decisions.
objectiveWe sought to develop a web-based system that uses a prostate cancer (CaP) registry to provide newly diagnosed men with a platform to view predicted treatment decisions based on patients with similar characteristics. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThe Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) is a quality improvement consortium of urology practices that maintains a prospective registry of men with CaP. We used registry data from 45 MUSIC urology practices from 2015 to 2017 to develop and validate a random forest machine learning model. After fitting the random forest model to a derivation cohort consisting of a random two-thirds sample of patients after stratifying by practice location, we evaluated the model performance in a validation cohort consisting of the remaining one-third of patients using a multiclass area under the curve (AUC) measure and calibration plots. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 7543 men diagnosed with CaP, of whom 45% underwent radical prostatectomy, 30% surveillance, 17% radiation therapy, 5.6% androgen deprivation, and 1.8% watchful waiting. The personalized prediction for patients in the validation cohort was highly accurate (AUC 0.81).
conclusionsUsing clinical registry data and machine learning methods, we created a web-based platform for patients that generates accurate predictions for most CaP treatments. PATIENT SUMMARY: We have developed and tested a tool to help men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer to view predicted treatment decisions based on similar patients from our registry. We have made this tool available online for patients to use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.