Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30318150›Full record

ArticleCell2018

Statistical Detection of Relatives Typed with Disjoint Forensic and Biomedical Loci.

Jaehee Kim, Michael D Edge, Bridget F B Algee-Hewitt, Jun Z Li, Noah A Rosenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward minimal SNP sets for record-matching with CODIS STR profiles.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Record-matching of STR profiles with fragmentary genomic SNP data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Associations between forensic loci and expression levels of neighboring genes may compromise medical privacy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2019
    Article
  16. When Biology Gets Personal: Hidden Challenges of Privacy and Ethics in Biological Big Data.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jaehee KimDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Michael D EdgeDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Bridget F B Algee-HewittDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jun Z LiDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Noah A RosenbergDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: noahr@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Population genetics for large-scale sequencing studies of diverse populationsR01HG005855 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Noah Rosenberg, Paul A Scheet · 2010 to 2026
$5.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In familial searching in forensic genetics, a query DNA profile is tested against a database to determine whether it represents a relative of a database entrant. We examine the potential for using linkage disequilibrium to identify pairs of profiles as belonging to relatives when the query and database rely on nonoverlapping genetic markers. Considering data on individuals genotyped with both microsatellites used in forensic applications and genome-wide SNPs, we find that ∼30%-32% of parent-offspring pairs and ∼35%-36% of sib pairs can be identified from the SNPs of one member of the pair and the microsatellites of the other. The method suggests the possibility of performing familial searches of microsatellite databases using query SNP profiles, or vice versa. It also reveals that privacy concerns arising from computations across multiple databases that share no genetic markers in common entail risks, not only for database entrants, but for their close relatives as well.

Indexed as

FamilyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideFemaleForensic GeneticsGenetics, PopulationGenotyping TechniquesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPedigreeforensic DNAgenomic privacypopulation geneticsrecord matchingrelatedness

Identifiers

PMID30318150
PMCPMC6240431
OpenAlexW2895913642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.