Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30317437›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

A machine learning pipeline for internal anatomical landmark embedding based on a patient surface model.

Xia Zhong, Norbert Strobel, Annette Birkhold, Markus Kowarschik, Rebecca Fahrig, Andreas Maier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. XDose: toward online cross-validation of experimental and computational X-ray dose estimation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xia ZhongPattern Recognition Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Martensstr. 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. xia.zhong@fau.de.
Norbert StrobelFakultät für Elektrotechnik, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany.
Annette BirkholdSiemens Healthineers, Advanced Therapies, Forchheim, Germany.
Markus KowarschikSiemens Healthineers, Advanced Therapies, Forchheim, Germany.
Rebecca FahrigSiemens Healthineers, Advanced Therapies, Forchheim, Germany.
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Martensstr. 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith the recent introduction of fully assisting scanner technologies by Siemens Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany), a patient surface model was introduced to the diagnostic imaging device market. Such a patient representation can be used to automate and accelerate the clinical imaging workflow, manage patient dose, and provide navigation assistance for computed tomography diagnostic imaging. In addition to diagnostic imaging, a patient surface model has also tremendous potential to simplify interventional imaging. For example, if the anatomy of a patient was known, a robotic angiography system could be automatically positioned such that the organ of interest is positioned in the system's iso-center offering a good and flexible view on the underlying patient anatomy quickly and without any additional X-ray dose.

methodTo enable such functionality in a clinical context with sufficiently high accuracy, we present an extension of our previous patient surface model by adding internal anatomical landmarks associated with certain (main) bones of the human skeleton, in particular the spine. We also investigate different approaches to positioning of these landmarks employing CT datasets with annotated internal landmarks as training data. The general pipeline of our proposed method comprises the following steps: First, we train an active shape model using an existing avatar database and segmented CT surfaces. This stage also includes a gravity correction procedure, which accounts for shape changes due to the fact that the avatar models were obtained in standing position, while the CT data were acquired with patients in supine position. Second, we match the gravity-corrected avatar patient surface models to surfaces segmented from the CT datasets. In the last step, we derive the spatial relationships between the patient surface model and internal anatomical landmarks.

resultWe trained and evaluated our method using cross-validation using 20 datasets, each containing 50 internal landmarks. We further compared the performance of four different generalized linear models' setups to describe the positioning of the internal landmarks relative to the patient surface. The best mean estimation error over all the landmarks was achieved using lasso regression with a mean error of [Formula: see text].

conclusionConsidering that interventional X-ray imaging systems can have detectors covering an area of about [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) at iso-center, this accuracy is sufficient to facilitate automatic positioning of the X-ray system.

Indexed as

Machine LearningHumansSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnatomical landmarkImagingInterventionalPatient modelingStatistical shape modelX-ray

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.