Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30317378›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2020

Trauma center need: the American College of Surgeons' definition in contrast to Swiss highly specialized medicine regulations-a Swiss trauma center perspective.

Thomas Gross, Philipp Braken, Felix Amsler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02165137 (Quality Control in the Management of Major Trauma Patients at Aarau Cantonal Hospital - Evaluation of Processes and Patient Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02165137 completednot on this map

Quality Control in the Management of Major Trauma Patients at Aarau Cantonal Hospital - Evaluation of Processes and Patient Outcome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKantonsspital AarauRan2010 to 2020Enrolled3,800ConditionsInjury, Trauma, Major Trauma, Multiple Trauma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative analysis of MGAP, GAP, and RISC2 as predictors of patient outcome and emergency interventional need in emergency room treatment of the injured.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  2. Short-term outcome following significant trauma: increasing age per se has only a relatively low impact.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas GrossDepartment of Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Tellstr.1, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland. thomas.gross@ksa.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-3932
Philipp BrakenDepartment of Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Tellstr.1, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Felix AmslerAmsler Consulting, Gundeldingerrain 111, 4059, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Cantonal Hospital Aarau Scientific Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccording to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommendations, the benchmark for trauma center need (TCN) is an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. In contrast, Swiss highly specialized medicine (HSM) regulations set out TCN for all patients with an ISS > 19 or an Abbreviated Injury Severity (AIS) of the head ≥ 3. This investigation assessed to what extent the modification might be justified.

methodsConsecutive analysis of all significantly injured (new ISS, NISS ≥ 8) adults treated in a trauma center from 2010 to 2016 based on their ISS and AIS head and in respect to utilized resources and outcome.

resultsOf 2171 patients (mean age 57.2 ± 21.6; ISS 15.0 ± 8.5) 40.1% fulfilled the ACS and 52.7% the HSM-definition of TCN. Comparative analysis of specified subgroups representing combinations of the ISS and the AIS head revealed that patients within the HSM but not within the ACS-definition of TCN achieved worse outcomes in mortality or on the Glasgow Outcome Score and had a higher inpatient rehabilitation rate than patients with an ISS < 15 and an AIS head < 3 compared to patients with an ISS > 15. Mortality for patients with an ISS 16-19 and AIS head < 3 (qualifying for the ACS but not the HSM-definition of TCN) was found to be twice as high for patients who were not in the ACS or the HSM group (ISS < 16 & AIS head < 3).

conclusionsIf confirmed by others, both the ACS and the Swiss-recommendations for TCN should be adapted accordingly, provided that the resultant increased workload is feasible for the trauma centers concerned.

Indexed as

Glasgow Outcome ScaleHospital MortalityNeeds AssessmentTrauma CentersAbbreviated Injury ScaleAdultAgedCraniocerebral TraumaFemaleHospitals, RehabilitationHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedSwitzerlandUnited StatesHighly specialized medicineMajor traumaOutcomeTrauma center needTrauma team activationTriage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.