Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30316227›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2018

Development and Content Validation of a Transcultural Instrument to Assess Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation in Healthcare Organizations: The OR4KT.

Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Randa Attieh, Sandra Dunn, Gonzalo Grandes, Paola Bully, Carole A Estabrooks, France Légaré, Geneviève Roch, Mathieu Ouimet

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie-Pierre GagnonPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada.
Randa AttiehPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada.
Sandra DunnCRED Research Centre - École Supérieure des Affaires, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gonzalo GrandesBetter Outcomes Registry & Nerwork (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Paola BullyBetter Outcomes Registry & Nerwork (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Carole A EstabrooksBioCruces Health Research Institute, Baracaldo, Spain.
France LégaréFaculty of Nursing and School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Geneviève RochPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada.
Mathieu OuimetPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing effective interventions in healthcare requires organizations to be ready to support change. This study aimed to develop, adapt transculturally, and assess the content and face validity of the Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation (OR4KT) tool. The OR4KT was designed to measure the readiness of healthcare organizations to implement evidence-informed change across a variety of services.

methodsBased on systematic reviews of the literature, a Delphi exercise, and expert consultation, we first generated an initial pool of items. Second, we developed and assessed content validity of the pilot OR4KT questionnaire in English. Third, we created French and Spanish versions using a sequential forward and backward translation approach, and transcultural adaptation by a consensus process. Finally, we conducted pilot studies in three contexts - the Basque country region (Spain), and the provinces of Québec and Ontario (Canada) - where 30 experts assessed the face validity of the three versions of OR4KT.

resultsWe selected 59 items, grouped in 6 dimensions (organizational climate, context, change content, leadership, organizational support, and motivation) for the final English version of OR4KT. Translation and transcultural adaptation did not identify any content or language problems. Our findings indicate that the English, French and Spanish versions of OR4KT are linguistically equivalents and have high face validity. Only minor revisions to the wording of some items were recommended.

conclusionThe OR4KT holds promise as a measure of readiness for knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare organizations. The validity and reliability of the three versions of the OR4KT will be assessed in real-life contexts of implementation of evidence-based changes in healthcare.

Indexed as

CanadaHealth PromotionHealth Services ResearchHumansOrganizational InnovationPrimary Health CarePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, BiomedicalHealthcare OrganizationsInstrument DevelopmentKnowledge TranslationReadiness for ChangeTranscultural Validation

Identifiers

PMID30316227
PMCPMC6186488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.