Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30315907›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

BOLD mapping of human epileptic spikes recorded during simultaneous intracranial EEG-fMRI: The impact of automated spike classification.

Niraj K Sharma, Carlos Pedreira, Umair J Chaudhary, Maria Centeno, David W Carmichael, Tinonkorn Yadee, Teresa Murta, Beate Diehl, Louis Lemieux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Niraj K SharmaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; MRI Unit, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom.
Carlos PedreiraDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Sensium Healthcare, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Umair J ChaudharyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; MRI Unit, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom; Neurology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Maria CentenoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; MRI Unit, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Clinica Universidad de Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
David W CarmichaelDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom; Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Tinonkorn YadeeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; Prasat Neurological Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teresa MurtaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Beate DiehlDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; MRI Unit, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom.
Louis LemieuxDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom; MRI Unit, Epilepsy Society, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom. Electronic address: louis.lemieux@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0200216Medical Research Council G0301067Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSimultaneous intracranial EEG and functional MRI (icEEG-fMRI) can be used to map the haemodynamic (BOLD) changes associated with the generation of IEDs. Unlike scalp EEG-fMRI, in most patients who undergo icEEG-fMRI, IEDs recorded intracranially are numerous and show variability in terms of field amplitude and morphology. Therefore, visual marking can be highly subjective and time consuming. In this study, we applied an automated spike classification algorithm, Wave_clus (WC), to IEDs marked visually on icEEG data acquired during simultaneous fMRI acquisition. The motivation of this work is to determine whether using a potentially more consistent and unbiased automated approach can produce more biologically meaningful BOLD patterns compared to the BOLD patterns obtained based on the conventional, visual classification.

methodsWe analysed simultaneous icEEG-fMRI data from eight patients with severe drug resistant epilepsy, and who subsequently underwent resective surgery that resulted in a good outcome: confirmed epileptogenic zone (EZ). For each patient two fMRI analyses were performed: one based on the conventional visual IED classification and the other based on the automated classification. We used the concordance of the IED-related BOLD maps with the confirmed EZ as an indication of their biological meaning, which we compared for the automated and visual classifications for all IED originating in the EZ.

resultsAcross the group, the visual and automated classifications resulted in 32 and 24 EZ IED classes respectively, for which 75% vs 83% of the corresponding BOLD maps were concordant. At the single-subject level, the BOLD maps for the automated approach had greater concordance in four patients, and less concordance in one patient, compared to those obtained using the conventional visual classification, and equal concordance for three remaining patients. These differences did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionWe found automated IED classification on icEEG data recorded during fMRI to be feasible and to result in IED-related BOLD maps that may contain similar or greater biological meaning compared to the conventional approach in the majority of the cases studied. We anticipate that this approach will help to gain significant new insights into the brain networks associated with IEDs and in relation to postsurgical outcome.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultBrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisElectroencephalographyEpilepsyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsAutomated IED classificationBOLD responseEEG-fMRIIEDIntracranial EEG

Identifiers

PMID30315907
PMCPMC6264381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.