Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30315514›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2019

Predicting state transitions in brain dynamics through spectral difference of phase-space graphs.

Patrick Luckett, Elena Pavelescu, Todd McDonald, Lee Hively, Juan Ochoa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Graph theory in paediatric epilepsy: A systematic review.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emerging techniques in statistical analysis of neural data.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick LuckettDepartment of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. luckett.patrick@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2262-6605
Elena PavelescuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Todd McDonaldSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Lee HivelyOak Ridge National Laboratory (retired), Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA.
Juan OchoaDepartment of Neurology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA.
University of South Alabama · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networks are naturally occurring phenomena that are studied across many disciplines. The topological features of a network can provide insight into the dynamics of a system as it evolves, and can be used to predict changes in state. The brain is a complex network whose temporal and spatial behavior can be measured using electroencephalography (EEG). This data can be reconstructed to form a family of graphs that represent the state of the brain over time, and the evolution of these graphs can be used to predict changes in brain states, such as the transition from preictal to ictal in patients with epilepsy. This research proposes objective indications of seizure onset observed from minimally invasive scalp EEG. The approach considers the brain as a complex nonlinear dynamical system whose state can be derived through time-delay embedding of the EEG data and characterized to determine change in brain dynamics related to the preictal state. This method targets phase-space graph spectra as biomarkers for seizure prediction, correlates historical degrees of change in spectra, and makes accurate prediction of seizure onset. A significant trend of normalized dissimilarity over time indicates a departure from the norm, and thus a change in state. Our methods show high sensitivity (90-100%) and specificity (90%) on 241 h of scalp EEG training data, and sensitivity and specificity of 70%-90% on test data. Moreover, the algorithm was capable of processing 12.7 min of data per second on an Intel Core i3 CPU in Matlab, showing that real-time analysis is viable.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalSeizuresSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultEpilepsyGraph spectraPhase-space graph analysisSeizure prediction

Identifiers

PMID30315514
OpenAlexW2897474177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.