ArticleHeart and vessels2019
Electrocardiographic characteristics in the patients with a persistent left superior vena cava.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrophysiological Changes in Children with Isolated Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: A Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Implantable venous access port placement in the upper arm of breast cancer patients with persistent left superior vena cava: a case series and literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Low Atrial Rhythm in a Large Cohort of Children from Transylvania, Romania.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a congenital venous abnormality and is usually asymptomatic and does not cause hemodynamic disturbances. Therefore, it is difficult to identify it by routine examinations in clinical practice. This study aimed to elucidate the electrocardiographic characteristics for the prediction of a PLSVC. Twelve patients (9 males, 56.2 ± 18.3 years) who were diagnosed with a PLSVC were enrolled. The electrocardiographic parameters, including the P-wave duration, axis, and morphology of the P waves, were automatically measured and compared to 150 controls (77 males, 57.3 ± 14.6 years). There were no significant differences in the P-wave duration. Negative or positive/negative P waves in lead III predicted a PLSVC with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 81%. The P-wave axis in PLSVC exhibited a significant leftward deviation as compared to the controls (14.8 ± 21.1 vs. 54.0 ± 17.4°, p < 0.001). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the P-wave axis for predicting a PLSVC exhibited an area under curve of 0.93 [CI 95% (0.87-0.98), p < 0.001), and identified a P-wave axis of less than 37.5° to have a 92% sensitivity and 83% specificity in predicting a PLSVC. A negative or positive/negative P-wave morphology in lead III was a useful finding for suggesting the presence of a PLSVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30315495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.