Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30315489›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019

Limitations of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in neurosurgical setting: our case experience.

Neeraja Ajayan, Keta Thakkar, Karen Ruby Lionel, Ajay Prasad Hrishi

Abstract readCase ReportsLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neeraja AjayanNeuroanesthesia Division, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India.
Keta ThakkarNeuroanesthesia Division, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India.
Karen Ruby LionelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Ajay Prasad HrishiNeuroanesthesia Division, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, India. drajay@sctimst.ac.in.
Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the primary goals of anaesthesia in neurosurgical procedures is prevention of cerebral hypoxia leading to secondary neurological injury. Cerebral oximetry detects periods of cerebral hypoxemia and allows intervention for prevention of secondary brain injury and its sequelae. This can be achieved by the use of Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS). In this regard, we present two cases where erroneous values of NIRS were shown which hindered monitoring of cerebral oxygenation in the intraoperative setting. In a neurosurgical setting, the erroneous values on the operative side could be attributed to altered tissue boundary conditions resulting in a changed optical path, which is normally held as a constant in NIRS measurements. The altered tissue boundary conditions could be due to the presence of air or blood between the myocutaneous flapskull, skull-dura, dura-brain interphases. It could also be that the sensors' penetrating depth was inadequate to compensate for the increased distance between sensor and brain tissue, thereby resulting in inaccurately higher values (> 80%).

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationNeurosurgical ProceduresSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAnesthesiaBrainFemaleHumansHypoxiaMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeOximetryPostoperative ComplicationsCerebral oxygenationNear infrared spectroscopyNeurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID30315489
OpenAlexW2897843484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.