Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30315409›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2019

Pharmacokinetics Comparison, Intestinal Absorption and Acute Toxicity Assessment of a Novel Water-Soluble Astragaloside IV Derivative (Astragalosidic Acid, LS-102).

Lin-Sen Qing, Ting-Bo Chen, Wen-Xia Sun, Li Chen, Pei Luo, Zhi-Feng Zhang, Li-Sheng Ding

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Phytochemistry, Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Biomolecules · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Antioxidant Action ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin-Sen QingChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Ting-Bo ChenState Key Laboratory for Quality Research of Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau, China.
Wen-Xia SunAntibiotics Research and Re-evaluation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Industrial Institute of Antibiotics, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China.
Li ChenState Key Laboratory for Quality Research of Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau, China.
Pei LuoState Key Laboratory for Quality Research of Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau, China. pluo@must.edu.mo.
Zhi-Feng ZhangState Key Laboratory for Quality Research of Chinese Medicines, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau, China.
Li-Sheng DingChengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China.
Macau University of Science and Technology · MOChinese Academy of Sciences · CNChengdu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAstragaloside IV (AGS IV) is the most important bioactive constituent of Radix Astragali. However, its disappointing clinical application is mainly caused by its very low solubility in biologic fluids, resulting in poor bioavailability after oral administration. We recently obtained a novel water-soluble derivative of AGS IV (astragalosidic acid, LS-102) that displayed significant cardioprotective potential against hypoxia-induced injury. The objective of this study was to investigate the intestinal absorption, main pharmacokinetic parameters and acute toxicity of LS-102 in rodents compared with AGS IV.

methodsAn oral dose of LS-102 and AGS IV (20 mg/kg) was administered to Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, and blood samples were collected at predetermined time points. The plasma concentrations were detected by a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a compartmental model. In the intestinal permeability study, the transport of LS-102 across Caco-2 cell monolayers was investigated at six concentrations from 6.25 to 250 µM. Moreover, the acute toxicity of LS-102 (40-5000 mg/kg) via a single oral administration was investigated in BALB/c mice.

resultsLS-102 was rapidly absorbed, attaining a maximum concentration of 248.7 ± 22.0 ng/ml at 1.0 ± 0.5  h after oral administration. The relative bioavailability of LS-102 was twice that of AGS IV. LS-102 had a P

conclusionsOral LS-102 produced a pharmacokinetic profile different from AGS IV with higher bioavailability, while the toxic tolerance was similar to previous estimates. Thus, we speculated that LS-102 might provide better clinical efficacy and be a potential candidate for the new drug development of Radix Astragali.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsBenzoxazolesBiological TransportCaco-2 CellsFemaleHumansIntestinal AbsorptionMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySaponinsSolubilityastragaloside ABenzoxazolesLS-102SaponinsTriazinesTriterpenesWater

Identifiers

PMID30315409
OpenAlexW2897419654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.