Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30315366›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Physiological responses to hypoxic constant-load and high-intensity interval exercise sessions in healthy subjects.

S Chacaroun, I Vega-Escamilla Y Gonzalez, P Flore, S Doutreleau, Samuel Verges

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S ChacarounHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, UM Sports Pathologies, Hôpital Sud, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Avenue Kimberley, 38 434, Echirolles, France.
I Vega-Escamilla Y GonzalezHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, UM Sports Pathologies, Hôpital Sud, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Avenue Kimberley, 38 434, Echirolles, France.
P FloreHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, UM Sports Pathologies, Hôpital Sud, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Avenue Kimberley, 38 434, Echirolles, France.
S DoutreleauHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, UM Sports Pathologies, Hôpital Sud, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Avenue Kimberley, 38 434, Echirolles, France.
Samuel VergesHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, UM Sports Pathologies, Hôpital Sud, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Avenue Kimberley, 38 434, Echirolles, France. sverges@chu-grenoble.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-9222
Inserm · FR

Funding

Agir pour les Maladies Chroniques HYPINT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the acute cardiorespiratory as well as muscle and cerebral tissue oxygenation responses to submaximal constant-load (CL) and high-intensity interval (HII) cycling exercise performed in normoxia and in hypoxia at similar intensity, reproducing whole-body endurance exercise training sessions as performed in sedentary and clinical populations.

methodsHealthy subjects performed two CL (30 min, 75% of maximal heart rate, n = 12) and two HII (15 times 1-min high-intensity exercise-1-min passive recovery, n = 12) cycling exercise sessions in normoxia and in hypoxia [mean arterial oxygen saturation 76 ± 1% (clamped) during CL and 77 ± 5% (inspiratory oxygen fraction 0.135) during HII]. Cardiorespiratory and near-infrared spectroscopy parameters as well as the rate of perceived exertion were continuously recorded.

resultsPower output was 21 ± 11% and 15% (according to protocol design) lower in hypoxia compared to normoxia during CL and HII exercise sessions, respectively. Heart rate did not differ between normoxic and hypoxic exercise sessions, while minute ventilation was higher in hypoxia during HII exercise only (+ 13 ± 29%, p < 0.05). Quadriceps tissue saturation index did not differ significantly between normoxia and hypoxia (CL 60 ± 8% versus 59 ± 5%; HII 59 ± 10% versus 56 ± 9%; p > 0.05), while prefrontal cortex deoxygenation was significantly greater in hypoxia during both CL (66 ± 4% versus 56 ± 6%) and HII (58 ± 5% versus 55 ± 5%; p < 0.05) sessions. The rate of perceived exertion did not differ between normoxic and hypoxic CL (2.4 ± 1.7 versus 2.9 ± 1.8) and HII (6.9 ± 1.4 versus 7.5 ± 0.8) sessions (p > 0.05).

conclusionThis study indicates that at identical heart rate, reducing arterial oxygen saturation near 75% does not accentuate muscle deoxygenation during both CL and HII exercise sessions compared to normoxia. Hence, within these conditions, larger muscle hypoxic stress should not be expected.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingOxygen ConsumptionAdultBrainCardiorespiratory FitnessFemaleHumansHypoxiaMaleMuscle, SkeletalPhysical ExertionCerebral oxygenationConstant-load exerciseHigh-intensity exerciseHypoxiaMuscle oxygenation

Identifiers

PMID30315366
OpenAlexW2896554990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.