ArticleEye (London, England)2019
Giant cell arteritis in patients of Indian Subcontinental descent in the UK.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Giant Cell Arteritis: Updates and Controversies.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGCA in the Indian Subcontinent (ISC) is rare. Our centre in London, UK, serves an ethnically diverse population, including a significant population of patients of ISC descent. We hypothesise that patients of ISC descent are no less likely than others to present with symptoms suggestive of GCA and therefore to undergo temporal artery biopsy (TAB).
methodA retrospective audit of all TABs performed at our institution over an 8 year period, to identify ethnicity (white, black, ISC, other, unknown) and biopsy result. We compared the proportion of all patients of ISC descent attending the ED to the proportion of ISC patients undergoing TAB. We compared the proportion of positive TABs among ISC patients with positive TABs among white patients. We also compared the proportion of TAB in ISC patients with all non-ISC ethnicities combined.
resultsThe proportion of patients undergoing TAB who were of ISC descent (16.3% of 92) was comparable to the proportion of A&E attendances made up by ISC patients [p = 0.1339]. 3.8% (1/26) of positive biopsies were among patients of ISC descent. White patients were significantly more likely to have a positive biopsy than patients of ISC ethnicity (33% of 61 white patients vs. 7% of 15 ISC [p = 0.0456]), as were patients of non-ISC ethnicity (32.5% of 77 non-ISC patients vs. 7% of 15 ISC patients [p = 0.0464]). DISCUSSION: At our centre, biopsy proven GCA occurs in patients of ISC descent, but rarely. Full investigation for GCA continues to be appropriate where it is suspected, regardless of ethnicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.