Segmentation of family medicine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Finding safe harbour: reassessing 9 principles of family medicine in difficult times: Part 1 of the 10-part series, "Foundations for tomorrow".Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
   Article
2. Pitfalls and pleasures of pick-and-mix careers: portfolio working and whole-person medicine in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
   Article
3. Help patients navigate the system.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
   Article
4. At home and away.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Help patients navigate the system.2019
• Comment on
  Comprehensive practice: Normative definition across 3 generations of alumni from a single family practice program, 1985 to 2012.2018

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as