ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018
Using Twitter to Examine Web-Based Patient Experience Sentiments in the United States: Longitudinal Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Analysis of Patient Experiences of Periodontal Graft Surgery.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Perceived Quality of Service in Primary Health Care Based on Google Maps Reviews Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Sentiment Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Use of Natural Language Processing to Interpret Unstructured Patient Feedback on Health Services: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Sentiments of Individuals with Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Toward Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium: Infodemiology Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Privacy Concerns About Sharing General and Specific Health Information on Twitter: Quantitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Quantifying changes in societal optimism from online sentiment.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Using Twitter to understand perspectives and experiences of dementia and caregiving at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.Dementia (London, England) · 2022Article
- Risks and Opportunities to Ensure Equity in the Application of Big Data Research in Public Health.Annual review of public health · 2022Review
- The Federal Menu Labeling Law and Twitter Discussions about Calories in the United States: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Topical Fluoride Applications Related Posts Analysis on Twitter Using Natural Language Processing.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2021Article
- Assessing Patient-Perceived Hospital Service Quality and Sentiment in Malaysian Public Hospitals Using Machine Learning and Facebook Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Classifying patient and professional voice in social media health posts.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Article
- Influence of the pandemic dissemination of COVID-19 on facial rejuvenation: A survey of Twitter.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2020Article
- Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patient Experiences in the United States: 4-Year Content Analysis of Twitter.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Investigation of Geographic and Macrolevel Variations in LGBTQ Patient Experiences: Longitudinal Social Media Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Insulin pricing and other major diabetes-related concerns in the USA: a study of 46 407 tweets between 2017 and 2019.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Article
- Studying Public Perception about Vaccination: A Sentiment Analysis of Tweets.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Google Trends in Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Methodology Framework.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are documented differences in access to health care across the United States. Previous research indicates that Web-based data regarding patient experiences and opinions of health care are available from Twitter. Sentiment analyses of Twitter data can be used to examine differences in patient views of health care across the United States.
objectiveThe objective of our study was to provide a characterization of patient experience sentiments across the United States on Twitter over a 4-year period.
methodsUsing data from Twitter, we developed a set of 4 software components to automatically label and examine a database of tweets discussing patient experience. The set includes a classifier to determine patient experience tweets, a geolocation inference engine for social data, a modified sentiment classifier, and an engine to determine if the tweet is from a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan area in the United States. Using the information retrieved, we conducted spatial and temporal examinations of tweet sentiments at national and regional levels. We examined trends in the time of the day and that of the week when tweets were posted. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine if any differences existed between the discussions of patient experience in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas.
resultsWe collected 27.3 million tweets between February 1, 2013 and February 28, 2017, using a set of patient experience-related keywords; the classifier was able to identify 2,759,257 tweets labeled as patient experience. We identified the approximate location of 31.76% (876,384/2,759,257) patient experience tweets using a geolocation classifier to conduct spatial analyses. At the national level, we observed 27.83% (243,903/876,384) positive patient experience tweets, 36.22% (317,445/876,384) neutral patient experience tweets, and 35.95% (315,036/876,384) negative patient experience tweets. There were slight differences in tweet sentiments across all regions of the United States during the 4-year study period. We found the average sentiment polarity shifted toward less negative over the study period across all the regions of the United States. We observed the sentiment of tweets to have a lower negative fraction during daytime hours, whereas the sentiment of tweets posted between 8 pm and 10 am had a higher negative fraction. Nationally, sentiment scores for tweets in metropolitan areas were found to be more extremely negative and mildly positive compared with tweets in nonmetropolitan areas. This result is statistically significant (P<.001). Tweets with extremely negative sentiments had a medium effect size (d=0.34) at the national level.
conclusionsThis study presents methodologies for a deeper understanding of Web-based discussion related to patient experience across space and time and demonstrates how Twitter can provide a unique and unsolicited perspective from users on the health care they receive in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.