Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30314791›Full record

ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2018

Impact of foot-and-mouth disease on fertility performance in a large dairy herd in Kenya.

Gemma Chaters, Jonathan Rushton, Thomas Daido Dulu, Nicholas Anthony Lyons

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gemma ChatersVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Jonathan RushtonVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group, The Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Thomas Daido DuluState Department of Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, P.O. Private Bag Kabete, Kangemi 00625, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nicholas Anthony LyonsThe Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking GU24 0NF, UK; European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EuFMD), Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: nick.lyons@pirbright.ac.uk.
Royal Veterinary College · GBMinistry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries · KEThe Pirbright Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This was a retrospective cohort study using data collected from a large-scale dairy herd in Kenya (n = 328 female animals), to investigate the effects of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) on herd fertility performance following a confirmed outbreak in a regularly vaccinated herd. Kaplan-Meier graphs were used to depict differences in survival functions between exposure groups and Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for associations between being clinical FMD cases and the following fertility outcomes: age at first calving; fertility failure related culling (not in calf); time to first service; time to conception. Potential confounding variables investigated and controlled for were age, breed, parity, stage of lactation/gestation and eligibility for service. A case control study was nested within the cohort to investigate the effects of disease on conception HR following calving by comparing animals susceptible to fertility suppression at the time of the outbreak (cases) to animals that had conceived prior to the outbreak (controls). The median age of first calving in clinically affected young-stock was 2.7 months higher than non-clinical cases (adjusted HR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.21-0.67, P = 0.01). There was no evidence of a difference in fertility related culling and times to first service and conception. Animals susceptible to fertility suppression at the time of the outbreak had a lower hazard of conception compared to animals served prior to the outbreak (HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.41-0.75, P = 0.01). Within the herd, the odds of being a case decreased with parity and age likely related to the lifetime number of vaccination doses received which may reduce the impact among older animals in the herd. Moreover, one would expect the impact to be higher in a non-vaccinating herd to be higher. Notwithstanding these limitations, the results of this study provide evidence that FMD outbreaks in endemic settings impact herd fertility performance. An increased age at first calving is likely to increase rearing costs and reduce an animal's lifetime productivity while poorer conception rates will likely extend calving intervals. Impaired herd fertility and production will incur higher costs to the farmer and society as animals are less productive which for FMD can extend beyond the outbreak period where economic studies tend to focus. These impacts of FMD on herd fertility should be considered when conducting benefit-cost analyses of FMD control to inform resource allocation.

Indexed as

FertilityAnimalsCase-Control StudiesCattleCattle DiseasesCohort StudiesDairyingFemaleFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseIncidenceKenyaRetrospective StudiesEconomic impactEndemicFertilityFoot-and-mouth disease

Identifiers

PMID30314791
PMCPMC6193135
OpenAlexW2888043402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.