Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30314740›Full record

ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology2018

Cervical alterations in pregnancy.

Joy Vink, Kristin Myers

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme with Variations.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effect ofJournal of medicinal food · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joy VinkDept. of OB/GYN, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jyv2101@cumc.columbia.edu.
Kristin MyersDept. of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Evaluating the role of human cervical smooth muscle cells in normal and premature cervical remodelingK08HD088758 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VINK, JOY-SARAH · 2016 to 2020
$801k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD088758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB), defined as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, remains a significant obstetric dilemma even after decades of research in this field. Although trends from 2007 to 2014 showed the rate of preterm birth slightly decreased, the CDC recently reported the rate of preterm birth has increased for two consecutive years since 2014. Currently, 1 in 10 pregnancies in the US still end prematurely. In this chapter, we focus on the "compartment" of the cervix. The goal is to outline the current knowledge of normal cervical structure and function in pregnancy and the current knowledge of how the cervix malfunctions lead to SPTB. We review the mechanisms by which our current interventions are hypothesized to work. Finally, we outline gaps in knowledge and future research directions that may lead to novel and effective interventions to prevent premature cervical failure and SPTB.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerclage, CervicalCervix UteriFemaleHumansPessariesPregnancyPremature BirthProgesteroneProgestinsRisk FactorsProgesteroneProgestinsCervixPremature cervical remodelingPreterm birthShort cervix

Identifiers

PMID30314740
PMCPMC6282836
OpenAlexW2802110884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.