ArticleMaturitas2018
Personal, reproductive, and familial characteristics associated with bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women: A population-based case-control study.
Article in Maturitas, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trajectories of metabolic parameters after bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women.Maturitas · 2022Article
- Association of Premenopausal Bilateral Oophorectomy With Parkinsonism and Parkinson Disease.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and timing of menopause and gynecological surgery in the Nurses' Health Study II.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2022Article
- Risk of de novo cancer after premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- Premature or early bilateral oophorectomy: a 2021 update.Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society · 2021Article
- Mental health conditions diagnosed before bilateral oophorectomy: a population-based case-control study.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- The association of age at menopause and all-cause and cause-specific mortality by race, postmenopausal hormone use, and smoking status.Preventive medicine reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe investigated the association of personal, reproductive, and familial characteristics with bilateral oophorectomy performed for nonmalignant indications in a US population. STUDY
designIn an established cohort study, we used the records-linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP http://www.rochesterproject.org) to identify 1653 premenopausal women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy in Olmsted County, Minnesota between 1988 and 2007 for a nonmalignant indication. Each woman was matched by age (±1 year) to a population-based referent woman who had not undergone bilateral oophorectomy as of the index date. We used case-control analyses to investigate several characteristics associated with bilateral oophorectomy. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for race, education, and income.
resultsIn the overall analyses, infertility was more common in women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy than in the controls, whereas use of oral contraceptives, a history of breast feeding, and fibrocystic breast disease were less common. The women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy weighed more than controls, had a higher body mass index and were younger at menarche. The associations were more pronounced for women who underwent the bilateral oophorectomy before age 46 years, and some associations were different for women with or without a benign ovarian indication. Reported family histories of uterine and other cancers were more common in women without a benign ovarian indication.
conclusionsWe identified a number of personal, reproductive, and familial characteristics that were associated with bilateral oophorectomy over a 20-year period. Our historical findings may help inform decision-making about oophorectomy in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.