Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30314522›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Sustainability of collaborative care management for depression in primary care settings with academic affiliations across New York State.

Nathalie Moise, Ravi N Shah, Susan Essock, Amy Jones, Jay Carruthers, Margaret A Handley, Lauren Peccoralo, Lloyd Sederer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Telemental Health Collaborative Care Medication Management: Implementation and Outcomes.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Psychiatrist and Psychologist Experiences with Telehealth and Remote Collaborative Care in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathalie MoiseCenter for Behavioral and Cardiovascular Health, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W. 168th Street, PH9- Room 321, New York, NY, 10032, USA. nm2562@cumc.columbia.edu.
Ravi N ShahDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Susan EssockDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Amy JonesColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Jay CarruthersColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Margaret A HandleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lauren PeccoraloIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Lloyd SedererColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

UCSF Research in Implementation Sciences for Equity (RISE)R25HL126146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRYSTAL WILEY CENE, Alicia Fernandez · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
Depression Screening RCT in ACS patients: Quality of Life and Cost OutcomesR01HL114924 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KRONISH, IAN MATTHEW · 2013 to 2017
$4.2M
TRANSFORM DEPCARE: A Theoretical approach to improving patient engagement and shared decision making for minorities in collaborative depression careR01HS025198 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOISE, NATHALIE · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025198NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114924NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL126146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a large statewide initiative, New York State implemented collaborative care (CC) from 2012 to 2014 in 32 primary care settings where residents were trained and supported its sustainability through payment reforms implemented in 2015. Twenty-six clinics entered the sustainability phase and six opted out, providing an opportunity to examine factors predicting continued CC participation and fidelity.

methodsWe used descriptive statistics to assess implementation metrics in sustaining vs. opt-out clinics and trends in implementation fidelity 1 and 2 years into the sustainability phase among sustaining clinics. To characterize barriers and facilitators, we conducted 31 semi-structured interviews with psychiatrists, clinic administrators, primary care physicians, and depression care managers (24 at sustaining, 7 at opt-out clinics).

resultsAt the end of the implementation phase, clinics opting to continue the program had significantly higher care manager full-time equivalents (FTEs) and achieved greater clinical improvement rates (46% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.004) than opt-out clinics. At 1 and 2 years into sustainability, the 26 sustaining clinics had steady rates of depression screening, staffing FTEs and treatment titration rates, significantly higher contacts/patient and improvement rates and fewer enrolled patients/FTE. During the sustainability phase, opt-out sites reported lower patient caseloads/FTE, psychiatry and care manager FTEs, and physician/psychiatrist CC involvement compared to sustaining clinics. Key barriers to sustainability noted by respondents included time/resources/personnel (71% of respondents from sustaining clinics vs. 86% from opt-out), patient engagement (67% vs. 43%), and staff/provider engagement (50% vs. 43%). Fewer respondents mentioned early implementation barriers such as leadership support, training, finance, and screening/referral logistics. Facilitators included engaging patients (e.g., warm handoffs) (79% vs. 86%) and staff/providers (71% vs. 100%), and hiring personnel (75% vs. 57%), particularly paraprofessionals for administrative tasks (67% vs. 0%).

conclusionsClinics that saw early clinical improvement and who invested in staffing FTEs were more likely to elect to enter the sustainability phase. Structural rules (e.g., payment reform) both encouraged participation in the sustainability phase and boosted long-term outcomes. While limited to settings with academic affiliations, these results demonstrate that patient and provider engagement and care manager resources are critical factors to ensuring sustainability.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareCooperative BehaviorDepressionHumansImplementation ScienceInterviews as TopicNew YorkPatient Care TeamPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchTime FactorsWorkloadDepressionPrimary health careSustainability

Identifiers

PMID30314522
PMCPMC6186053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.