Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30314505›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

What strategies do desk-based workers choose to reduce sitting time and how well do they work? Findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Samantha K Stephens, Elizabeth G Eakin, Bronwyn K Clark, Elisabeth A H Winkler, Neville Owen, Anthony D LaMontagne, Marj Moodie, Sheleigh P Lawler, David W Dunstan, Genevieve N Healy

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Defaults at Work: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Nudges on Stand-Up Working.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alternatives for Measuring Sitting Accumulation in Workplace Surveys.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha K StephensSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. samantha.stephens@uq.edu.au.
Elizabeth G EakinSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Bronwyn K ClarkSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Elisabeth A H WinklerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Neville OwenBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Anthony D LaMontagneWork, Health & Wellbeing Unit, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Marj MoodieDeakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Sheleigh P LawlerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
David W DunstanSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Genevieve N HealySchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUDeakin University · AUBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1002706National Health and Medical Research Council 1003960National Health and Medical Research Council 1041020National Health and Medical Research Council 1057608National Health and Medical Research Council 107168National Health and Medical Research Council 1078360National Health and Medical Research Council 1086029National Health and Medical Research Council 511001National Health and Medical Research Council 569940Victorian Health Promotion Foundation 2010-0509Victorian Health Promotion Foundation Creating Healthy Workplaces program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge amounts of sitting at work have been identified as an emerging occupational health risk, and findings from intervention trials have been reported. However, few such reports have examined participant-selected strategies and their relationships with behaviour change.

methodsThe Stand Up Victoria cluster-randomised controlled trial was a workplace-delivered intervention comprising organisational, environmental and individual level behaviour change strategies aimed at reducing sitting time in desk-based workers. Sit-stand workstations were provided, and participants (n = 134; intervention group only) were guided by health coaches to identify strategies for the 'Stand Up', 'Sit Less', and 'Move More' intervention targets, including how long they would stand using the workstation. Three-month workplace sitting and activity changes (activPAL3-assessed total sitting, prolonged sitting (i.e., sitting ≥30 min continuously) and purposeful walking) were evaluated in relation to the number (regression analysis) and types of strategies (decision-tree analysis).

resultsOver 80 different strategies were nominated by participants. Each additional strategy nominated for the 'Stand Up' intervention target (i.e. number of strategies) was associated with a reduction in prolonged sitting of 27.6 min/8-h workday (95% CI: -53.1, - 2.1, p = 0.034). Types of strategies were categorised into 13 distinct categories. Strategies that were task-based and phone-based were common across all three targets. The decision tree models did not select any specific strategy category as predicting changes in prolonged sitting ('Stand Up'), however four strategy categories were identified as important for total sitting time ('Sit Less') and three strategy categories for purposeful walking ('Moving More'). The uppermost nodes (foremost predictors) were nominating > 3 h/day of workstation standing (reducing total workplace sitting) and choosing a 'Move More' task-based strategy (purposeful walking).

conclusionsWorkers chose a wide range of strategies, with both strategy choice and strategy quantity appearing relevant to behavioural improvement. Findings support a tailored and pragmatic approach to encourage a change in sitting and activity in the workplace. Evaluating participant-selected strategies in the context of a successful intervention serves to highlight options that may prove feasible and effective in other desk-based workplace environments.

trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials register ( ACTRN12611000742976 ) on 15 July 2011.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorOccupational HealthSedentary BehaviorSitting PositionStanding PositionWalkingWorkAdultAustraliaChoice BehaviorCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkplaceInterventionOffice workersPhysical activitySedentarySitting timeWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID30314505
PMCPMC6186123
OpenAlexW2897822343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.