Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30314469›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Improving network inference algorithms using resampling methods.

Sean M Colby, Ryan S McClure, Christopher C Overall, Ryan S Renslow, Jason E McDermott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean M ColbyEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Ryan S McClureEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Christopher C OverallEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Ryan S RenslowEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Jason E McDermottEarth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA. jason.mcdermott@pnnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-2572

Funding

Biological and Environmental Research NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelatively small changes to gene expression data dramatically affect co-expression networks inferred from that data which, in turn, can significantly alter the subsequent biological interpretation. This error propagation is an underappreciated problem that, while hinted at in the literature, has not yet been thoroughly explored. Resampling methods (e.g. bootstrap aggregation, random subspace method) are hypothesized to alleviate variability in network inference methods by minimizing outlier effects and distilling persistent associations in the data. But the efficacy of the approach assumes the generalization from statistical theory holds true in biological network inference applications.

resultsWe evaluated the effect of bootstrap aggregation on inferred networks using commonly applied network inference methods in terms of stability, or resilience to perturbations in the underlying expression data, a metric for accuracy, and functional enrichment of edge interactions.

conclusionBootstrap aggregation results in improved stability and, depending on the size of the input dataset, a marginal improvement to accuracy assessed by each method's ability to link genes in the same functional pathway.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene ExpressionGene Regulatory NetworksHumansAggregationBootstrappingGene regulatory network inferenceRandom subspace methodResampling

Identifiers

PMID30314469
PMCPMC6186128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.