Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30314299›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Shared Sanitation Management and the Role of Social Capital: Findings from an Urban Sanitation Intervention in Maputo, Mozambique.

Tess Shiras, Oliver Cumming, Joe Brown, Becelar Muneme, Rassul Nala, Robert Dreibelbis

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Sanitation in Rural India: Exploring the Associations between Dwelling Space and Household Latrine Ownership.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tess ShirasDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. tess.shiras@gmail.com.
Oliver CummingDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Oliver.Cumming@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-8709
Joe BrownSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. joe.brown@ce.gatech.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-4148
Becelar MunemeWeConsult, R. Fernando Ganhão, Maputo 1103, Mozambique. bacelar@we-consult.info.
Rassul NalaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Av. Eduardo Mondlane 1008, Maputo 1101, Mozambique. rassulmn@gmail.com.
Robert DreibelbisDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Robert.Dreibelbis@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9716-0419

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared sanitation-sanitation facilities shared by multiple households-is increasingly common in rapidly growing urban areas in low-income countries. However, shared sanitation facilities are often poorly maintained, dissuading regular use and potentially increasing disease risk. In a series of focus group discussions and in-depth interviews, we explored the determinants of shared sanitation management within the context of a larger-scale health impact evaluation of an improved, shared sanitation facility in Maputo, Mozambique. We identified a range of formal management practices users developed to maintain shared sanitation facilities, and found that management strategies were associated with perceived latrine quality. However-even within an intervention context-many users reported that there was no formal system for management of sanitation facilities at the compound level. Social capital played a critical role in the success of both formal and informal management strategies, and low social capital was associated with collective action failure. Shared sanitation facilities should consider ways to support social capital within target communities and identify simple, replicable behavior change models that are not dependent on complex social processes.

Indexed as

SanitationSocial CapitalToilet FacilitiesCitiesDeveloping CountriesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMozambiquecollective actionsanitationshared sanitationsocial capitalurban

Identifiers

PMID30314299
PMCPMC6210686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.