Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30313090›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

The use of SAPS 3, SOFA, and Glasgow Coma Scale to predict mortality in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study.

Anibal Basile-Filho, Alessandra Fabiane Lago, Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti, Edson Antonio Nicolini, Roosevelt Santos Nunes, Silas Lucena de Lima, João Paulo Uvera Ferreira, Marcus Antonio Feres

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anibal Basile-FilhoDivision of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo.
Alessandra Fabiane LagoIntensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto.
Mayra Gonçalves MeneguetiIntensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto.
Edson Antonio NicoliniIntensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto.
Roosevelt Santos NunesIntensive Care Unit, Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto.
Silas Lucena de LimaIntensive Care Unit, Hospital São Francisco, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
João Paulo Uvera FerreiraIntensive Care Unit, Hospital São Francisco, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Marcus Antonio FeresIntensive Care Unit, Hospital São Francisco, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) management and several grading systems or prognostic indices have been used not only to improve the quality of care but to predict also the outcome of these patients. Among them, the gold standards Fisher radiological grading scale, Hunt-Hess and the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) are the most employed. The objective of this study is to compare the predictive values of simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) 3, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in the outcome of patients with aneurysmal SAH.Fifty-one SAH patients (33% males and 67% females; mean age of 54.1 ± 10.3 years) admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) in the post-operative phase were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into survivors (n=37) and nonsurvivors (n = 14). SAPS 3, Fischer scale, WFNS, SOFA, and GCS were recorded on ICU admission (day 1 - D1), and 72-hours (day 3 - D3) SOFA, and GCS. The capability of each index SAPS 3, SOFA, and GCS (D1 and D3) to predict mortality was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the respective confidence interval (CI) were used to measure the index accuracy. The level of significance was set at P < .05.The mean SAPS 3, SOFA, and GCS on D1 were 13.5 ± 12.7, 3.1 ± 2.4, and 13.7 ± 2.8 for survivors and 32.5 ± 28.0, 5.6 ± 4.9, and 13.5 ± 1.9 for nonsurvivors, respectively. The AUC and 95% CI for SAPS 3, SOFA, and GCS on D1 were 0.735 (0.592-0.848), 0.623 (0.476-0.754), 0.565 (0.419-0.703), respectively. The AUC and 95% CI for SOFA and GCS on D3 were 0.768 (0.629-0.875) and 0.708 (0.563-0.826), respectively. The overall mortality was 37.8%.Even though SAPS 3 and Fischer scale predicted mortality better on admission (D1), both indices SOFA and GCS performed similarly to predict outcome in SAH patients on D3.

Indexed as

Glasgow Coma ScaleOrgan Dysfunction ScoresSimplified Acute Physiology ScoreAdultArea Under CurveFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSubarachnoid Hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID30313090
PMCPMC6203557
OpenAlexW2897592161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.