ArticleMedicine2018
Development of a survey form through Delphi study about adverse events associated with the miniscalpel needle, for application in prospective observational studies regarding safety of miniscalpel needles: Study protocol.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Improving Delphi Process in Acupuncture Decision Making: Overall Descriptions and Quality Assessment of Delphi Reports.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Acupotomy in Korean Medicine Doctors: A Preliminary Survey on Experiences, Perceptions, and Clinical Usage Status.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using magnetic resonance imaging to measure the depth of acupotomy points in the lumbar spine: A retrospective study.Integrative medicine research · 2021Article
- Model construction of medical endoscope service evaluation system-based on the analysis of Delphi method.BMC health services research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the wide usage of miniscalpel-needles (MSNs), information about MSN treatment-related adverse events (AEs) is insufficient. As the definition of AE might vary among physicians, without an exact definition for pain and hemorrhage, it is difficult to provide accurate information about AEs in MSN treatment to physicians, researchers, and patients. The aim of our study is to reach a consensus about the items and definitions of AEs that should be included in the survey form for prospective observational multicenter studies to record MSN treatment-related AEs. We will especially focus on obtaining a consensus on the definition of pain and hemorrhage caused by MSN treatment.
methodsOur study protocol is composed of 6 steps. First, we will identify the aim of the study. Next, we will conduct a systematic review to investigate MSN treatment-related AEs reported till date in Korea. Third, we will conduct a pilot observational prospective single-center study on AEs in MSN treatment. We will develop a standardized case report form to record MSN treatment-related AEs, including the causality, severity, and details of the MSN procedure at every site. Next, based on the pilot study, the Delphi study questionnaire will be developed by a panel composed of 13 physicians. The Delphi study will have 4 rounds with open questions and 4-point Likert-scale closed questions. Through these rounds, we will develop a consensus about the items and definitions of AEs that should be included in the survey form for future multicenter studies about MSN treatment-related AEs. Following this, a face-to-face consensus meeting will be held for a final agreement of survey form. The final survey form will then be approved by the related academic society for dissemination. DISCUSSION: The aim of this protocol is to develop a survey form for future prospective observational multicenter studies on MSN treatment-related AEs. This protocol will present the research methodology for developing a survey form, which will improve consistency and reliability between MSN treatment studies. We believe that this protocol can evaluate the safety of MSN treatment.
trial registrationClinical Research Information Service: KCT0002849.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.