ArticleMedicine2018
Infliximab versus cyclosporine for severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroids: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Esculentoside A could attenuate apoptosis and inflammation in TNBS-induced ulcerative colitis via inhibiting the nuclear translocation of NF-κB.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfliximab and cyclosporine are two main therapies in treating acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), our objective is to assess the effectiveness and safety of cyclosporine (CSA) versus infliximab (IFX) as rescue agents in patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC).
methodsWe will search three databases from inception to May 2018, and 19 studies are identified that infliximab and cyclosporine as a treatment in steroid-refractory UC patients. The primary outcome was short-term response to treatment. Secondary outcomes included the rates of colectomy at 3 months, 12 months, 36 months, adverse drug reactions and mortality in those who received rescue therapy.
resultsThis update review will provide a high quality synthesis of current evidence of two treatment for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The definition of severe colitis is according to Truelove and Witts' criteria.
conclusionsIn the treatment of steroid-resistant ulcerative colitis with infliximab and cyclosporine, there is no difference between the two treatments on short-term and long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.