Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30312940›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

Event-related desynchronization during movement attempt and execution in severely paralyzed stroke patients: An artifact removal relevance analysis.

Eduardo López-Larraz, Thiago C Figueiredo, Ainhoa Insausti-Delgado, Ulf Ziemann, Niels Birbaumer, Ander Ramos-Murguialday

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eduardo López-LarrazInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: eduardo.lopez-larraz@uni-tuebingen.de.
Thiago C FigueiredoInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Ainhoa Insausti-DelgadoInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany; International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience, Tübingen, Germany; IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
Ulf ZiemannDepartment of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Niels BirbaumerInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany; Wyss Institute for Bio- and Neuroengineering, Genève, Switzerland.
Ander Ramos-MurguialdayInstitute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Germany; Neural Engineering Laboratory, Health Department, TECNALIA, San Sebastián, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electroencephalogram (EEG) constitutes a relevant tool to study neural dynamics and to develop brain-machine interfaces (BMI) for rehabilitation of patients with paralysis due to stroke. However, the EEG is easily contaminated by artifacts of physiological origin, which can pollute the measured cortical activity and bias the interpretations of such data. This is especially relevant when recording EEG of stroke patients while they try to move their paretic limbs, since they generate more artifacts due to compensatory activity. In this paper, we study how physiological artifacts (i.e., eye movements, motion artifacts, muscle artifacts and compensatory movements with the other limb) can affect EEG activity of stroke patients. Data from 31 severely paralyzed stroke patients performing/attempting grasping movements with their healthy/paralyzed hand were analyzed offline. We estimated the cortical activation as the event-related desynchronization (ERD) of sensorimotor rhythms and used it to detect the movements with a pseudo-online simulated BMI. Automated state-of-the-art methods (linear regression to remove ocular contaminations and statistical thresholding to reject the other types of artifacts) were used to minimize the influence of artifacts. The effect of artifact reduction was quantified in terms of ERD and BMI performance. The results reveal a significant contamination affecting the EEG, being involuntary muscle activity the main source of artifacts. Artifact reduction helped extracting the oscillatory signatures of motor tasks, isolating relevant information from noise and revealing a more prominent ERD activity. Lower BMI performances were obtained when artifacts were eliminated from the training datasets. This suggests that artifacts produce an optimistic bias that improves theoretical accuracy but may result in a poor link between task-related oscillatory activity and BMI peripheral feedback. With a clinically relevant dataset of stroke patients, we evidence the need of appropriate methodologies to remove artifacts from EEG datasets to obtain accurate estimations of the motor brain activity.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAdultAgedBrainBrain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementParalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedStrokeartifactsbrain-machine interfaces (BMI)Electroencephalogram (EEG)motor cortical activitystroke

Identifiers

PMID30312940
PMCPMC6180341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.