Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30312742›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V2018

Passive inhalation of dry powder influenza vaccine formulations completely protects chickens against H5N1 lethal viral challenge.

Jasmine Tomar, Carin Biel, Cornelis A M de Haan, Peter J M Rottier, Nikolai Petrovsky, Henderik W Frijlink, Anke Huckriede, Wouter L J Hinrichs, Ben Peeters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jasmine TomarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Carin BielDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Cornelis A M de HaanVirology Division, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Utrecht University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter J M RottierVirology Division, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Utrecht University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nikolai PetrovskyVaxine Pty Ltd., Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Adelaide 5042, Australia; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia.
Henderik W FrijlinkDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Anke HuckriedeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Wouter L J HinrichsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Ben PeetersWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Department of Virology, Houtribweg 39, 8221 RA, Lelystad, the Netherlands. Electronic address: ben.peeters@wur.nl.

Funding

Novel vaccine adjuvants to counter bioterrorist threatsU01AI061142 · NIAID · FLINDERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA · PI PETROVSKY, NIKOLAI · 2005 to 2009
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800039CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400053CNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI061142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bird to human transmission of high pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV) poses a significant risk of triggering a flu pandemic in the human population. Therefore, vaccination of susceptible poultry during an HPAIV outbreak might be the best remedy to prevent such transmissions. To this end, suitable formulations and an effective mass vaccination method that can be translated to field settings needs to be developed. Our previous study in chickens has shown that inhalation of a non-adjuvanted dry powder influenza vaccine formulation during normal breathing results in partial protection against lethal influenza challenge. The aim of the present study was to improve the effectiveness of pulmonary vaccination by increasing the vaccine dose deposited in the lungs and by the use of suitable adjuvants. Two adjuvants, namely, Bacterium-like Particles (BLP) and Advax, were spray freeze dried with influenza vaccine into dry powder formulations. Delivery of dry formulations directly at the syrinx revealed that BLP and Advax had the potential to boost either systemic or mucosal immune responses or both. Upon passive inhalation of dry influenza vaccine formulations in an optimized set-up, BLP and Advax/BLP adjuvanted formulations induced significantly higher systemic immune responses than the non-adjuvanted formulation. Remarkably, all vaccinated animals not only survived a lethal influenza challenge, but also did not show any shedding of challenge virus except for two out of six animals in the Advax group. Overall, our results indicate that passive inhalation is feasible, effective and suitable for mass vaccination of chickens if it can be adapted to field settings.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, InhalationAnimalsAntibodies, ViralChemistry, PharmaceuticalChickensImmunity, MucosalImmunizationInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesPowdersVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesPowdersVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvantsChallengeInfluenzaInhalationPassivePowdersProtectionPulmonary

Identifiers

PMID30312742
PMCPMC7126314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.