ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2019
Estimating hemodynamic stimulus and blood vessel compliance from cerebral blood flow data.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Overload, Microbleeding and the Role of Bilirubin in Alzheimer's Disease Brain: Revisiting the Vascular Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A quantitative model for human neurovascular coupling with translated mechanisms from animals.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several key brain imaging modalities that are intended for retrieving information about neuronal activity in brain, the BOLD fMRI as a foremost example, rely on the assumption that elevated neuronal activity elicits spatiotemporally well localized increase of the oxygenated blood volume, which in turn can be monitored non-invasively. The details of the signaling in the neurovascular unit during hyperemia are still not completely understood, and remain a topic of active research, requiring good mathematical models that are able to couple the different aspects of the signaling event. In this work, the question of estimating the hemodynamic stimulus function from cerebral blood flow data is addressed. In the present model, the hemodynamic stimulus is a non-specific signal from the electrophysiological and metabolic complex that controls the compliance of the blood vessels, leading to a vasodilation and thereby to an increase of blood flow. The underlying model is based on earlier literature, and it is further developed in this article for the needs of the inverse problem, which is solved using hierarchical Bayesian methodology, addressing also the poorly known model parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.