Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30312445›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Mechanistic machine learning: how data assimilation leverages physiologic knowledge using Bayesian inference to forecast the future, infer the present, and phenotype.

David J Albers, Matthew E Levine, Andrew Stuart, Lena Mamykina, Bruce Gluckman, George Hripcsak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. From Reflection to Action: Combining Machine Learning with Expert Knowledge for Nutrition Goal Recommendations.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Physician understanding, explainability, and trust in a hypothetical machine learning risk calculator.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David J AlbersDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Matthew E LevineDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew StuartDepartment of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Lena MamykinaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Bruce GluckmanDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

OMOP information model for eMERGE phenotypingU01HG008680 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 2015 to 2026
$13.3M
DISCOVERING AND APPLYING KNOWLEDGE IN CLINICAL DATABASESR01LM006910 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HRIPCSAK, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2023
$10.6M
Mechanistic Machine LearningR01LM012734 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ALBERS, DAVID J., GLUCKMAN, BRUCE J · 2017 to 2019
$2.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008680NLM NIH HHS R01 LM006910NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce data assimilation as a computational method that uses machine learning to combine data with human knowledge in the form of mechanistic models in order to forecast future states, to impute missing data from the past by smoothing, and to infer measurable and unmeasurable quantities that represent clinically and scientifically important phenotypes. We demonstrate the advantages it affords in the context of type 2 diabetes by showing how data assimilation can be used to forecast future glucose values, to impute previously missing glucose values, and to infer type 2 diabetes phenotypes. At the heart of data assimilation is the mechanistic model, here an endocrine model. Such models can vary in complexity, contain testable hypotheses about important mechanics that govern the system (eg, nutrition's effect on glucose), and, as such, constrain the model space, allowing for accurate estimation using very little data.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalBayes TheoremBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringData MiningDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansInsulinNormal DistributionPhenotypeRegression AnalysisBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID30312445
PMCPMC6188514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.