Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30312335›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The added value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Fabio Zugni, Francesca Ruju, Paola Pricolo, Sarah Alessi, Monica Iorfida, Marco Angelo Colleoni, Massimo Bellomi, Giuseppe Petralia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06071195 (All-in-One Prostate Cancer Staging with MRI), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06071195 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

All-in-One Prostate Cancer Staging with MRI

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2021 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsProstate CancerArmsProstate Cancer Patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Does the addition of whole-body MRI to routine imaging influence real-world treatment decisions in metastatic breast cancer?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio ZugniPost-graduation school in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9448-4760
Francesca RujuDepartment of Radiological Science and Radiation Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Paola PricoloDepartment of Radiological Science and Radiation Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Sarah AlessiDepartment of Radiological Science and Radiation Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Monica IorfidaDivision of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Marco Angelo ColleoniDivision of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Massimo BellomiDepartment of Radiological Science and Radiation Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe PetraliaDepartment of Radiological Science and Radiation Therapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) in addition to CT of chest-abdomen-pelvis (CT-CAP) and 18F-FDG PET/CT (PET/CT) on systemic treatment decisions in standard clinical practice for patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). WB-MRI examinations in ABC patients were extracted from our WB-MRI registry (2009-2017). Patients under systemic treatment who underwent WB-MRI and a control examination (CT-CAP or PET/CT) were included. Data regarding progressive disease (PD) reported either on WB-MRI or on the control examinations were collected. Data regarding eventual change in treatment after the imaging evaluation were collected. It was finally evaluated whether the detection of PD by any of the two modalities had induced a change in treatment. Among 910 WB-MRI examinations in ABC patients, 58 had a paired control examination (16 CT-CAP and 42 PET/CT) and were analysed. In 23/58 paired examinations, additional sites of disease were reported only on WB-MRI and not on the control examination. In 17/28 paired examinations, PD was reported only on WB-MRI and not on the control examination. In 14 out of the 28 pairs of examinations that were followed by a change in treatment, PD had been reported only on WBMRI (14/28; 50%), while stable disease had been reported on the control examination. In conclusion, WB-MRI disclosed PD earlier than the control examination (CT-CAP or PET/CT), and it was responsible alone for 50% of all changes in treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone NeoplasmsBreastBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID30312335
PMCPMC6185838
OpenAlexW2896588247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.