Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30312159›Full record

Trial reportJournal of complementary & integrative medicine2018

Model structure for protocol adherence utilizing a manualized therapeutic massage intervention.

Erika R Larson, Becky Kinkead, Sherry A Edwards, Pamela J Schettler, Boadie W Dunlop, Jeffrey J Rakofsky, Mark H Rapaport

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of complementary & integrative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erika R LarsonAtlanta School of Massage, Atlanta, GA,USA.
Becky KinkeadDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sherry A EdwardsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pamela J SchettlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Boadie W DunlopDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jeffrey J RakofskyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark H RapaportDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Efficacy of Massage Therapy for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety DisorderR21AT004208 · NCCIH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RAPAPORT, MARK HYMAN · 2010 to 2012
$645k
Efficacy of swedish massage therapy on cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivorsR21AT007090 · NCCIH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RAPAPORT, MARK HYMAN · 2013 to 2014
$357k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT004208NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT007090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The Protocol Training and Assessment Model (Model) was developed through collaboration between Emory University School of Medicine and Atlanta School of Massage to minimize intra- and inter-therapist variability for two research massage therapist (rMT) applied intervention arms in the Massage for Cancer-Related Fatigue (MCRF) early-phase study. The Model was followed to maintain and assess protocol integrity for the study's manualized Swedish massage therapy (SMT) and light touch (LT) interventions. Methods The Model includes initial rMT training, quarterly retraining sessions, accessible resources (scripts, treatment guides, weekly research personnel meetings), and ongoing monitoring. Model efficacy was assessed by monitoring data collected at retraining sessions, through audio recording review, and through subject and rMT reporting. Results Model application resulted in a high level of intervention consistency throughout the study. Protocol-related session comment rate by subjects was 2.7%. Few study participants reported intra-rMT or inter-rMT treatment delivery differences. Observation during retraining sessions indicated massage therapists continued to adhere to protocols. Importantly rMTs increased their participation beyond core duties, suggesting additional ways to standardize subject treatment experience. Conclusions Through systematic application of the Protocol Training and Assessment Model, continuous and collaborative quality improvement discussions between scientists and research massage therapists resulted in reliable, standardized SMT and LT interventions for the MCRF early-phase study. Future research can apply the Model to support and assess consistent rMT-delivered intervention applications.

Indexed as

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceBreast NeoplasmsClinical ProtocolsFatigueFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMassageProgram EvaluationTeachingcollaborationfidelityprotocoltherapeutic massagetraining model

Identifiers

PMID30312159
PMCPMC11748186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.