Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30312130›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2018

The Surprise Question as a Prognostic Tool #360.

Kate S Jennings, Sean Marks, Hillary D Lum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate S Jennings
Sean Marks
Hillary D Lum

Funding

Refining an Advance Care Planning Group Visit intervention – a novel intervention to engage older adults in advance care planningK76AG054782 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LUM, HILLARY · 2016 to 2019
$864k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG054782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance Care PlanningHumansMedical FutilityPrognosisReferral and ConsultationSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID30312130
PMCPMC6909735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.