Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311907›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Perceptual processing in the ventral visual stream requires area TE but not rhinal cortex.

Mark Ag Eldridge, Narihisa Matsumoto, John H Wittig, Evan C Masseau, Richard C Saunders, Barry J Richmond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Correlates of Category Learning in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Visual recognition in rhesus monkeys requires area TE but not TEO.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark Ag EldridgeLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4292-6832
Narihisa MatsumotoHuman Informatics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
John H WittigSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0465-1022
Evan C MasseauLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Richard C SaundersLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.
Barry J RichmondLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8234-1540

Funding

Neural Coding Of Visual StimuliZIAMH002032 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI RICHMOND, BARRY J · 2009 to 2025
$20.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002032NIMH NIH HHS 1ZIAMH002032-41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an on-going debate over whether area TE, or the anatomically adjacent rhinal cortex, is the final stage of visual object processing. Both regions have been implicated in visual perception, but their involvement in non-perceptual functions, such as short-term memory, hinders clear-cut interpretation. Here, using a two-interval forced choice task without a short-term memory demand, we find that after bilateral removal of area TE, monkeys trained to categorize images based on perceptual similarity (morphs between dogs and cats), are, on the initial viewing, badly impaired when given a new set of images. They improve markedly with a small amount of practice but nonetheless remain moderately impaired indefinitely. The monkeys with bilateral removal of rhinal cortex are, under all conditions, indistinguishable from unoperated controls. We conclude that the final stage of the integration of visual perceptual information into object percepts in the ventral visual stream occurs in area TE.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCatsCerebral CortexDogsMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermTemporal LobeVisual CortexVisual Perceptioninferotemporalneuroscienceperceptionperirhinal cortexrhesus macaquetemporal lobeventral visual streamvison

Identifiers

PMID30311907
PMCPMC6207425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.