Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311905›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Sensory experience inversely regulates feedforward and feedback excitation-inhibition ratio in rodent visual cortex.

Nathaniel J Miska, Leonidas Ma Richter, Brian A Cary, Julijana Gjorgjieva, Gina G Turrigiano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reciprocal interaction between cortical SST and PV interneurons in top-down regulation of retinothalamic refinement.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visual Deprivation during Mouse Critical Period Reorganizes Network-Level Functional Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In vivo extracellular recordings of thalamic and cortical visual responses reveal V1 connectivity rules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. A circuit mechanism for independent modulation of excitatory and inhibitory firing rates after sensory deprivation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathaniel J MiskaDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-4919
Leonidas Ma RichterMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.
Brian A CaryDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States.
Julijana GjorgjievaMax Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-4079
Gina G TurrigianoDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-4059
Brandeis University · USMax Planck Institute for Brain Research · DE

Funding

Gating of Firing Rate Homeostasis by Sleep and Wake States During Experience-Dependent PlasticityR01EY025613 · NEI · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI TURRIGIANO, GINA G · 2017 to 2025
$3.9M
Synaptic Homeostasis in Neocortical Neurons and CircuitsR37NS092635 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI TURRIGIANO, GINA G · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
Experience dependent homeostatic synaptic plasticity in cortical microcircuitsF31NS089170 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MISKA, NATHANIEL · 2014 to 2016
$87k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025613NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS089170NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS092635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brief (2-3d) monocular deprivation (MD) during the critical period induces a profound loss of responsiveness within binocular (V1b) and monocular (V1m) regions of rodent primary visual cortex. This has largely been ascribed to long-term depression (LTD) at thalamocortical synapses, while a contribution from intracortical inhibition has been controversial. Here we used optogenetics to isolate and measure feedforward thalamocortical and feedback intracortical excitation-inhibition (E-I) ratios following brief MD. Despite depression at thalamocortical synapses, thalamocortical E-I ratio was unaffected in V1b and shifted toward excitation in V1m, indicating that thalamocortical excitation was not effectively reduced. In contrast, feedback intracortical E-I ratio was shifted toward inhibition in V1m, and a computational model demonstrated that these opposing shifts produced an overall suppression of layer 4 excitability. Thus, feedforward and feedback E-I ratios can be independently tuned by visual experience, and enhanced feedback inhibition is the primary driving force behind loss of visual responsiveness.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsInterneuronsLong-Term Synaptic DepressionMice, Inbred C57BLNeural InhibitionPyramidal CellsRats, Long-EvansSensationSensory DeprivationSynapsesThalamusVisual Cortexcritical periodexcitation-inhibition ratiomouseneuroscienceoptogeneticsratrodentthalamocorticalvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID30311905
PMCPMC6224193
OpenAlexW2897263213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.