Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311848›Full record

Trial reportJournal of women's health (2002)2018

An Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Intervention in a Nurse Home Visitation Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lynette Feder, Phyllis Holditch Niolon, Jacquelyn Campbell, Daniel J Whitaker, Jessica Brown, Whitney Rostad, Sarah Bacon

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lynette Feder1 Department of Criminal Justice, The University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
Phyllis Holditch Niolon2 Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jacquelyn Campbell3 School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel J Whitaker4 School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jessica Brown4 School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Whitney Rostad2 Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sarah Bacon2 Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USGeorgia State University · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training in Trauma and Violence (IRTTV)T32HD094687 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELCHER, HAROLYN MILLICENT EDITH, CAMPBELL, JACQUELYN CUTLER · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD094687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health problem with many negative consequences, particularly for pregnant women. This randomized trial investigated the effectiveness of an IPV preventive intervention embedded within the Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) program. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants enrolled over a 20-month period and were interviewed at baseline and 1- and 2-year follow-up. Eligibility criteria included first pregnancy, eligible for the nutrition program Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), English or Spanish speaking, and at least 15 years of age. All women initially referred and screened were randomized to either intervention (NFP+) or control (NFP only) condition. The final sample consisted of 238 women completing baseline assessments; retention was 81% at 2-year follow-up.

resultsAnalyses indicated that there were no main effects: the intervention affected participants differently depending on their baseline experience with IPV. For physical violence victimization, an interaction between baseline victimization and treatment was found; the intervention reduced victimization at 1 year (and approached significance at 2 years), but only among women who had not experienced past-year physical victimization at baseline. For sexual violence victimization, another interaction emerged; women in the intervention group were more likely to report sexual violence victimization at 2-year follow-up, but only among participants who had reported sexual victimization at baseline. The only effect on IPV perpetration was psychological perpetration at 2-year follow-up; again, the treatment effect was moderated by baseline perpetration. The intervention reduced psychological perpetration for participants who were nonperpetrators at baseline, but had no effect on those reporting perpetration.

conclusionsOverall, findings suggest that the intervention was effective in reducing some forms of violence among those not experiencing IPV at baseline, but was ineffective or potentially harmful for those already experiencing IPV.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsDomestic ViolenceFemaleHome Care ServicesHouse CallsHumansInfantInfant WelfareIntimate Partner ViolenceMaternal WelfareMothersNursesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnant PeopleUnited StatesYoung Adultdomestic violenceintimate partner violenceIPV prevention and/or interventionmaternal-infant healthnurse home visiting

Identifiers

PMID30311848
PMCPMC6306672
OpenAlexW2896026407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.