Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311794›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2019

Reporting Insulin Pump Accuracy: Trumpet Curves According to IEC 60601-2-24 and Beyond.

Stefan Pleus, Ulrike Kamecke, Delia Waldenmaier, Guido Freckmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan Pleus1 Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-7754
Ulrike Kamecke1 Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Delia Waldenmaier1 Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Guido Freckmann1 Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy of insulin pump basal rate delivery, if tested according to the standard IEC 60601-2-24 for infusion pumps, shall be presented as a trumpet curve. This way of graphical presentation is common; however, it is often misunderstood and misinterpreted by people. It is often assumed that a trumpet curve shows the error rate as a function of time, thus implying an increasing accuracy in the course of time. On the contrary, the horizontal axis of a trumpet curve shows increasingly long observation windows. In addition, trumpet curves display only extreme values, that is, those windows with minimal and maximal deviation, which might not be representative for the total deviation. This commentary provides information regarding the calculations and the interpretation of trumpet curves and proposes alternative approaches.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsData AccuracyData Interpretation, StatisticalDiabetes MellitusDrug Dosage CalculationsEquipment and SuppliesGermanyHumansInfusion PumpsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMedical Device LegislationReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignInsulinaccuracybasal rateIEC 60601-2-24insulin pumptrumpet curve

Identifiers

PMID30311794
PMCPMC6501542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.