Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311641›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2018

Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

R Clifford, N Govindarajah, J L Parsons, S Gollins, N P West, D Vimalachandran

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. cRGD-Conjugated FeInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R CliffordInstitute of Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-0197
N GovindarajahInstitute of Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J L ParsonsInstitute of Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
S GollinsNorth Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, UK.
N P WestLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
D VimalachandranInstitute of Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBGlan Clwyd Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to improve response and it is unclear what the clinical endpoints of such trials should be.

methodsA qualitative systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using preset search criteria across the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases from 1990 to 2017. Additional results were generated from the reference lists of included papers.

resultsA total of 123 papers were identified, of which 37 were included; a further 60 articles were obtained from additional referencing to give a total of 97 articles. Neoadjuvant radiosensitization for locally advanced rectal cancer using fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment. The oral derivative capecitabine has practical advantages over 5-fluorouracil, with equal efficacy, but the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent has yet to show a consistent significant efficacy benefit in randomized clinical assessment. Preclinical and early-phase trials are progressing with promising novel agents, such as small molecular inhibitors and nanoparticles.

conclusionDespite extensive research and promising preclinical studies, a definite further agent in addition to fluoropyrimidines that consistently improves response rate has yet to be found.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCapecitabineChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicErbB ReceptorsFluorouracilHumansImmunotherapyIrinotecanNeoadjuvant TherapyOxaliplatinPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBevacizumabCapecitabineErbB ReceptorsFluorouracilIrinotecanOxaliplatinPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID30311641
PMCPMC6282533
OpenAlexW2896991339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.