ArticleCancer2018
Differences in molecular features of triple-negative breast cancers based on the age at diagnosis.
Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addition of Carboplatin to Sequential Taxane-Anthracycline Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Suppression of NGALR impedes TNBC cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and migration through Akt/mTOR and JAK/STAT3 pathway inhibition.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Assessing the recurrence rate in locally advanced Luminal A patients compared to triple-negative patients in Shahid Rahimi Hospital Khorramabad in 2022: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Understanding the Electrochemical MOF Sensors in Detecting Cancer with Special Emphasis on Breast Carcinoma Biomarkers.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2025Review
- Exploration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Comprehensive Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Based on Molecular Pathological Mechanism.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
- Dysregulated miRNA Expression and Androgen Receptor Loss in Racially Distinct Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Low HER2 expression is a predictor of poor prognosis in stage I triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups-prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Overall Survival Among Women With Small, Node-Negative, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- DNA methylation of the long intergenic noncoding RNA 299 gene in triple-negative breast cancer: results from a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Increased RNA Expression of von Willebrand Factor Gene Is Associated With Infiltrating Lobular Breast Cancer and Normal PAM50 Subtype.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
- Epidemiology of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the proportion of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) diagnosed among older women is low, the number of TNBC cases is substantial because of the high incidence of breast cancer after the age of 65 years. The molecular features of TNBC in this age group have not been well described.
methodsThis study examined a population-based cohort of women with stage I to III TNBC diagnosed between the ages of 25 and 91 years with the PAM50 gene expression subtyping assay. The concordance between the TNBC classification by immunohistochemistry and the gene expression classification by PAM50, the expression of individual genes, and 5-year recurrence and breast cancer mortality in older women (≥65 years old) and younger women (<50 years old) was assessed.
resultsThe molecular subtype distribution in TNBC was significantly different according to the age at diagnosis. TNBC was more likely to be classified as basal-like in women younger than 50 years (sensitivity, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.97) than women 65 years old or older (sensitivity, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87); 35% of clinical TNBC cases in the latter group were the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched subtype by molecular classification. Older women with TNBC also had significantly higher expression of ERBB2 and lower expression of all 10 proliferation-associated genes tested (P < .01). The risk of breast cancer death within 5 years was significantly higher in women with TNBC in comparison with women with hormone receptor-positive cancers in all age groups.
conclusionsThis study revealed differences in molecular subtypes among clinical TNBC cases based on patient age. A potentially targetable HER2-enriched group raises the possible need for intrinsic subtyping in older women with TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.