Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311638›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Differences in molecular features of triple-negative breast cancers based on the age at diagnosis.

H Evin Gulbahce, Philip S Bernard, Erin K Weltzien, Rachel E Factor, Lawrence H Kushi, Bette J Caan, Carol Sweeney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Suppression of NGALR impedes TNBC cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and migration through Akt/mTOR and JAK/STAT3 pathway inhibition.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H Evin GulbahceDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.ORCID 0000-0003-1869-0268
Philip S BernardDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Erin K WeltzienDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Rachel E FactorDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Bette J CaanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Carol SweeneyDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipR01CA105274 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2004 to 2014
$19.9M
Molecular Profiles and Lifestyle Factors in Breast Cancer PrognosisR01CA129059 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CAAN, BETTE J · 2009 to 2013
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105274NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129059NIH Office of the Director R01CA105274NIH Office of the Director R01CA129059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the proportion of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) diagnosed among older women is low, the number of TNBC cases is substantial because of the high incidence of breast cancer after the age of 65 years. The molecular features of TNBC in this age group have not been well described.

methodsThis study examined a population-based cohort of women with stage I to III TNBC diagnosed between the ages of 25 and 91 years with the PAM50 gene expression subtyping assay. The concordance between the TNBC classification by immunohistochemistry and the gene expression classification by PAM50, the expression of individual genes, and 5-year recurrence and breast cancer mortality in older women (≥65 years old) and younger women (<50 years old) was assessed.

resultsThe molecular subtype distribution in TNBC was significantly different according to the age at diagnosis. TNBC was more likely to be classified as basal-like in women younger than 50 years (sensitivity, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.97) than women 65 years old or older (sensitivity, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.87); 35% of clinical TNBC cases in the latter group were the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched subtype by molecular classification. Older women with TNBC also had significantly higher expression of ERBB2 and lower expression of all 10 proliferation-associated genes tested (P < .01). The risk of breast cancer death within 5 years was significantly higher in women with TNBC in comparison with women with hormone receptor-positive cancers in all age groups.

conclusionsThis study revealed differences in molecular subtypes among clinical TNBC cases based on patient age. A potentially targetable HER2-enriched group raises the possible need for intrinsic subtyping in older women with TNBC.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAge of OnsetErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSurvival AnalysisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancerepidemiologymolecular subtypeolder womenprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30311638
PMCPMC6294689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.