ArticleJournal of athletic training2018
The Self-Efficacy of Certified Athletic Trainers in Assessing and Managing Sport-Related Concussions.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concussion Assessment and Management Self-efficacy Among Irish Clinicians.Sports health · 2025Article
- Concussion-Related Decision-Making by Certified Athletic Trainers: Implications for Concussion Prevention and Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Serum Amyloid Beta Precursor Protein, Neurofilament Light, and Visinin-like Protein-1 in Rugby Players: An Exploratory Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 is not elevated in the serum of concussed rugby players: an observational cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- KNOWLEDGE OF VESTIBULAR OCULAR DYSFUNCTION AND UTILIZATION OF VESTIBULAR OCULAR MOTOR SCREENING (VOMS) TOOL COMPONENTS AMONG PROFESSIONAL SPORTS LEAGUE ATHLETIC TRAINERS.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2020Article
- Concussion Knowledge and Clinical Experience Among Athletic Trainers: Implications for Concussion Health Care Practices.Journal of athletic training · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
context: Diagnostic and return-to-play assessments of athletes with sport-related concussions (SRCs) have changed dramatically over the past decade. Currently, SRC assessment and management has taken a multifaceted approach, with new SRC measures being developed yearly. However, to date, no researchers have examined certified athletic trainers' (ATs') self-efficacy in assessing and managing a patient with an SRC.
objective: To examine the self-efficacy of ATs in assessing and managing athletes with SRCs, with a secondary purpose of examining job setting (high school and college).
design: Cross-sectional study.
setting: Web-based questionnaire. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participants: A total of 94 ATs (high school setting = 54.3%, n = 51; collegiate setting = 45.7%, n = 43) completed an online survey, for a response rate of 9.2%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):: The survey contained 3 primary subsections: demographics, self-efficacy in assessing SRCs, and self-efficacy in managing SRCs. Possible self-efficacy ratings for SRC assessment and management in the survey ranged from 0 to 100. Multivariate analyses of variance were performed to identify differences in the self-efficacy of high school and collegiate ATs in assessing and managing athletes with SRCs.
results: The self-efficacy of all 94 participants in their assessment of SRCs was 60.34 ± 14.5 and in their management of SRCs was 55.30 ± 14.1. Collegiate ATs reported higher self-efficacy in the assessment of SRCs using balance ( P < .001) and the King-Devick test ( P = .04), and their responses approached significance for vestibular-ocular motor screening ( P = .05). Additionally, their self-efficacy in the management of SRCs was greater using balance ( P < .001) and vestibular-ocular therapy ( P = .01) compared with high school ATs.
conclusions: Athletic trainers had moderate self-efficacy regarding their assessment and management of SRCs. Collegiate ATs had higher self-efficacy in newer SRC assessment and management tools than high school ATs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.