ArticleHuman mutation2018
The value of genomic variant ClinVar submissions from clinical providers: Beyond the addition of novel variants.
Article in Human mutation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten tips for ordering, interpreting, and communicating genetic test results in nephrology.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Investigating the frequency of unreported cases and laboratory correspondence practices for variants of uncertain significance in pediatric epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Gene Therapy for Genetic Syndromes: Understanding the Current State to Guide Future Care.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Review
- Exome/Genome-Wide Testing in Newborn Screening: A Proportionate Path Forward.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Using Long-Term Follow-Up Data to Classify Genetic Variants in Newborn Screened Conditions.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Challenges in genetic testing: clinician variant interpretation processes and the impact on clinical care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- GA4GH: International policies and standards for data sharing across genomic research and healthcare.Cell genomics · 2021Article
- Clinical Exome Reanalysis: Current Practice and Beyond.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2021Review
- Harmonizing the Collection of Clinical Data on Genetic Testing Requisition Forms to Enhance Variant Interpretation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM): A Study from the ClinGen Cardiomyopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2021Article
- A pediatric perspective on genomics and prevention in the twenty-first century.Pediatric research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing use of clinical genomic testing across broad medical disciplines, the need for data sharing and curation efforts to improve variant interpretation is paramount. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ClinVar database facilitates these efforts by serving as a repository for clinical assertions about genomic variants and associations with disease. Most variant submissions are from clinical laboratories, which may lack clinical details. Laboratories may also choose not to submit all variants. Clinical providers can contribute to variant interpretation improvements by submitting variants to ClinVar with their own assertions and supporting evidence. The medical genetics team at Geisinger's Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute routinely reviews the clinical significance of all variants obtained through clinical genomic testing, using published ACMG/AMP guidelines, clinical correlation, and post-test clinical data. We describe the submission of 148 sequence and 155 copy number variants to ClinVar as "provider interpretations." Of these, 192 (63.4%) were novel to ClinVar. Detailed clinical data were provided for 298 (98.3%), and when available, segregation data and follow-up clinical correlation or testing was included. This contribution marks the first large-scale submission from a neurodevelopmental clinical setting and illustrates the importance of clinical providers in collaborative efforts to improve variant interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.