Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30311381›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2018

The value of genomic variant ClinVar submissions from clinical providers: Beyond the addition of novel variants.

Karen E Wain, Emily Palen, Juliann M Savatt, Devin Shuman, Brenda Finucane, Andrea Seeley, Thomas D Challman, Scott M Myers, Christa Lese Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Challenges in genetic testing: clinician variant interpretation processes and the impact on clinical care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Exome Reanalysis: Current Practice and Beyond.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen E WainAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-7670
Emily PalenAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Juliann M SavattAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6444-1962
Devin ShumanAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Brenda FinucaneAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Andrea SeeleyAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Thomas D ChallmanAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Scott M MyersAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
Christa Lese MartinAutism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Resource ProjectU41HG006834 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI REHM, HEIDI L · 2013 to 2020
$26.9M
GENE DOSAGE IMBALANCE IN NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERSR01MH074090 · NIMH · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI David H. Ledbetter, CHRISTA LESE MARTIN · 2005 to 2026
$13.5M
Gender differences in quantitative measures of autonomic function and clinical features of the autism phenotypeR01MH107431 · NIMH · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI MARTIN, CHRISTA LESE · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG006834NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074090NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing use of clinical genomic testing across broad medical disciplines, the need for data sharing and curation efforts to improve variant interpretation is paramount. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ClinVar database facilitates these efforts by serving as a repository for clinical assertions about genomic variants and associations with disease. Most variant submissions are from clinical laboratories, which may lack clinical details. Laboratories may also choose not to submit all variants. Clinical providers can contribute to variant interpretation improvements by submitting variants to ClinVar with their own assertions and supporting evidence. The medical genetics team at Geisinger's Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute routinely reviews the clinical significance of all variants obtained through clinical genomic testing, using published ACMG/AMP guidelines, clinical correlation, and post-test clinical data. We describe the submission of 148 sequence and 155 copy number variants to ClinVar as "provider interpretations." Of these, 192 (63.4%) were novel to ClinVar. Detailed clinical data were provided for 298 (98.3%), and when available, segregation data and follow-up clinical correlation or testing was included. This contribution marks the first large-scale submission from a neurodevelopmental clinical setting and illustrates the importance of clinical providers in collaborative efforts to improve variant interpretation.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderDatabases, GeneticGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansClinVargenomic databasegenomic data sharingneurodevelopmental disordersprovider interpretationvariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID30311381
PMCPMC6190575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.